similar to: DMARC policies

On 30.11.2018 10.03, Per Jessen wrote: > Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers >> temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now >> taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily >> disabled members have been restored. >> >> Aki > Hi AKi >

Hi, I have just started to get dovecot list messages which I had not been receiving until today. How can I opt out (again)? regards, Michal Szymanski On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:42:22AM +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > Aki Tuomi wrote: > >On 30.11.2018 10.03, Per Jessen wrote: > > > >>Hi AKi > >> > >>I guess my address was re-subscribed then? I was subscribed

Same problem here. I clicked the unsubscribed button, but didnt receive the email. Regards Jan On 30. 11. 18 10:50, glide3 at gmail.com wrote: > Same problem here. > > https://dovecot.org/mailman/options/dovecot-news > > Sadly the remind password button / unsubscribe email button click and claim > to send me a email but they don't. > > Assume its due a high

UNSUBSCRIBE > -----Original Message----- > From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf > Of Michael A. Peters > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:21 AM > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: DMARC policies > > On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > Hi! > > > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers

Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers > temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now > taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily > disabled members have been restored. > > Aki Hi AKi I guess my address was re-subscribed then? I was subscribed as nomail before, do I need

Same problem here. https://dovecot.org/mailman/options/dovecot-news Sadly the remind password button / unsubscribe email button click and claim to send me a email but they don't. Assume its due a high mailq with the amount of messages that need to go out? Regards Rory -----Original Message----- From: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> On Behalf Of Michal Szymanski Sent:

Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 30.11.2018 10.03, Per Jessen wrote: > >> Hi AKi >> >> I guess my address was re-subscribed then? I was subscribed as nomail >> before, do I need to update that myself? >> >> thanks >> Per >> >> > Yes. I had to do it with an automated script and mailman withlist > interface is crappy. Sorry about this. No

Test from Yahoo via Android --Gene

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote: > The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature. > In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think > make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which > does not; a footer with the list URL is added. The real issue here is that the Mailman

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > Test from Yahoo via Android > > --Gene > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux As some users may already be aware, my test

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Test from Yahoo via Android > > > > --Gene > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslinux mailing list > > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > > Unsubscribe or set options at:

> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >?????????? <snip/> > > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > > but ignores

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: <snip/> > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure. > > The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject > > We shall see how

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily > disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions > to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have > been restored. > > Aki > > I've seen that happen on several lists. I disabled DMARC

On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;( > > It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again. I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC checking without using exceptions for the lists they are on. It's a known fact that DMARC does not

Hi guys, when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this problem and if so how? This is the first report: This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 208.100.23.70 on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0200. The message below did not meet the sending domain's DMARC policy. For

On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote: > * Juri Haberland via dovecot: > >> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences >> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving >> participants. > > Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also, > the issue was not on the

On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing