ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. Aki On 16.10.2017 13:22, Mar?a Arrea wrote:> > ??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this > the expected? > > ??? Regards > > ??? Mar?a > > El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: >> Hello >> >> ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my >> filesystem layout >> >> ??? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives >> ??? /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks >> ??? /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks >> >> ??? This is my mail_location: >> >> mail_location >> mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n >> >> >> >> ??? What should I write in mail_location with the new ITERINDEX setting? >> >> ??? Regards >> >> ??? Mar?a
El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?:> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. > > AkiSo ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right mail_location settings? mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n> > > On 16.10.2017 13:22, Mar?a Arrea wrote: >> ??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this >> the expected? >> >> ??? Regards >> >> ??? Mar?a >> >> El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: >>> Hello >>> >>> ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my >>> filesystem layout >>> >>> ??? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives >>> ??? /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks >>> ??? /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks >>> >>> ??? This is my mail_location: >>> >>> mail_location >>> mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n >>> >>> >>> >>> ??? What should I write in mail_location with the new ITERINDEX setting? >>> >>> ??? Regards >>> >>> ??? Mar?a
On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote:> El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >> >> Aki > So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right > mail_location settings? > > mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n > > >Precisely correct value is just INTERINDEX. No yes or no. Aki> > >> >> >> On 16.10.2017 13:22, Mar?a Arrea wrote: >>> ???? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this >>> the expected? >>> >>> ???? Regards >>> >>> ???? Mar?a >>> >>> El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> ???? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my >>>> filesystem layout >>>> >>>> ???? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives >>>> ???? /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks >>>> ???? /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks >>>> >>>> ???? This is my mail_location: >>>> >>>> mail_location >>>> mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ???? What should I write in mail_location with the new ITERINDEX >>>> setting? >>>> >>>> ???? Regards >>>> >>>> ???? Mar?a