search for: iterindex

On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >> >> Aki > So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right > mail_location settings? > > mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%...

ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. Aki On 16.10.2017 13:22, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > > ??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this > the expected? > > ??? Regards > > ??? Mar?a > > El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi...

Hello I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my filesystem layout /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks This is my mail_location: mail_location = mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26...

Thank you Mr. Aki ??? Should this info about ITERINDEX be present in https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation ? Bit confusing now. El 16/10/17 a las 12:35, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > > On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: >> El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >>> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value....

El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. > > Aki So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right mail_location settings? mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo...

??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this the expected? ??? Regards ??? Mar?a El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: > Hello > > ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my > filesystem layout > > ??? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives > ??? /buzones : 32x S...

# 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf Hello, we're using mail on NFS and the indexes on localdisk, with a director setup. (18K+ users) now to get more performance i thought to use the ITERINDEX option. however this has the side-effect on some mailboxes that it doesn't show the subfolders under INBOX. they seem 'disappeared'. Removing the ITERINDEX option fixes this again. Deleting the local indexes to be recreated doesn't solve the problem. What could cause this? and how...

...s disabled, things started to go to normal EXCEPT users were reporting they don't see all folders - which was true, only few on them were visible (INBOX, trash, sent etc.). We tried everything to make them visible again, for example deleting indexes, but nothing helped. Finally, removing option ITERINDEX from mail_location helped. > > Can anyone explain what happened? Thank you > > azurIt > >

...ed, things started to go to normal EXCEPT users were reporting they don't see all folders - which was true, only few on them were visible (INBOX, trash, sent etc.). We tried everything to make them visible again, for example deleting indexes, but nothing helped. Finally, removing option ITERINDEX from mail_location helped. Can anyone explain what happened? Thank you azurIt

??? We have upgraded today from Dovecot 2.2.31 to Dovecot 2.2.33.2 and modified our config to include ITERINDEX in mail_location and we are detecting some errors like this: /Dec 13 08:17:31 buzon_rhel7 dovecot: imap(rboloix): Error: stat(/buzones/location/18/48/rboloix/mailboxes/SIT - Pra&AwE-cticas 2014/dbox-Mails) failed: No such file or directory// //Dec 13 08:40:24 buzon_rhel7 dovecot: imap(espi...

...ill now warn that it most likely won't work as intended. + Various optimizations to avoid accessing files/directories when it's not necessary. Especially avoid accessing mail root directories when INDEX directories point to a different filesystem. + mail_location can now include ITERINDEX parameter. This tells Dovecot to perform mailbox listing from the INDEX path instead of from the mail root path. It's mainly useful when the INDEX storage is on a faster storage. + mail_location can now include VOLATILEDIR=<path> parameter. This is used for creating lock file...

...ill now warn that it most likely won't work as intended. + Various optimizations to avoid accessing files/directories when it's not necessary. Especially avoid accessing mail root directories when INDEX directories point to a different filesystem. + mail_location can now include ITERINDEX parameter. This tells Dovecot to perform mailbox listing from the INDEX path instead of from the mail root path. It's mainly useful when the INDEX storage is on a faster storage. + mail_location can now include VOLATILEDIR=<path> parameter. This is used for creating lock file...

...ail_location can now include NO-NOSELECT parameter. This > automatically deletes any \NoSelect mailboxes that have no children. > These mailboxes are sometimes confusing to users. Sorry for my IMAP ignorance, but how can this situation come about? > + mail_location can now include ITERINDEX parameter. This tells Dovecot > to perform mailbox listing from the INDEX path instead of from the > mail root path. It's mainly useful when the INDEX storage is on a > faster storage. > + If mailbox_list_index_very_dirty_syncs=yes, the list index is no > longer refr...

Timo Sirainen wrote: Thanks for the reply -- I think I can now write a new config to test these tasty features out. >>> + mail_location can now include NO-NOSELECT parameter. This >>> automatically deletes any \NoSelect mailboxes that have no children. >>> These mailboxes are sometimes confusing to users. >> >> Sorry for my IMAP ignorance, but how can

On 13 Dec 2017, at 9.55, Mar?a Arrea <maria.arrea at gmx.com> wrote: > > > We have upgraded today from Dovecot 2.2.31 to Dovecot 2.2.33.2 and modified our config to include ITERINDEX in mail_location and we are detecting some errors like this: > > > /Dec 13 08:17:31 buzon_rhel7 dovecot: imap(rboloix): Error: stat(/buzones/location/18/48/rboloix/mailboxes/SIT - Pra&AwE-cticas 2014/dbox-Mails) failed: No such file or directory// > //Dec 13 08:40:24 buzon_rhel7 d...

...ill now warn that it most likely won't work as intended. + Various optimizations to avoid accessing files/directories when it's not necessary. Especially avoid accessing mail root directories when INDEX directories point to a different filesystem. + mail_location can now include ITERINDEX parameter. This tells Dovecot to perform mailbox listing from the INDEX path instead of from the mail root path. It's mainly useful when the INDEX storage is on a faster storage. + mail_location can now include VOLATILEDIR=<path> parameter. This is used for creating lock file...

...ill now warn that it most likely won't work as intended. + Various optimizations to avoid accessing files/directories when it's not necessary. Especially avoid accessing mail root directories when INDEX directories point to a different filesystem. + mail_location can now include ITERINDEX parameter. This tells Dovecot to perform mailbox listing from the INDEX path instead of from the mail root path. It's mainly useful when the INDEX storage is on a faster storage. + mail_location can now include VOLATILEDIR=<path> parameter. This is used for creating lock file...

I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix. The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled Vacation/OOO response. The Vacation/OOO reply filter was created in Roundcubemail, but has been fine for years. One thing to note is in Dovecot 2.3.0 I did enable UTF8, but even if I disable UTF8