Timo (since he is the only one that maters here), In past couple of days I have seen 4 people on IRC bitten by 2.2.8 and pigeonhole bug, none of them are on this list, so like all others who want to download and build them, are unaware of the patch, so, given how wide the userbase is with pigeonhole sieve and dovecot, this would or should be considered a serious bug, so my question is Timo, is it not best to immediately push 2.2.9, or should even more server administrators become frustrated and curse waiting two more months until you have a list you think is best putting out a new release, many of them dont like the constant new releases all the time with only minor things, but with a build failure, thats a serious issue.
Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 07:20:> Timo (since he is the only one that maters here),so it should have being private mail ? that sayed i keep dovecot 1.x as the most recent stable version, and 2.x as the unstable development version that works for some but not all still have kernel 3.11.6 on gentoo, no problem with that, hmm :=) living on edge can be fun sometimes
* Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwards at gmail.com>:> Timo (since he is the only one that maters here), > > In past couple of days I have seen 4 people on IRC bitten by 2.2.8 and > pigeonhole bug, none of them are on this list, so like all others who > want to download and build them, are unaware of the patch,Which patch? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt at charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Thanks for providing and maintaining a great piece of software. Rick
Noel, I include you in the gang of three, and I only read half the posts on this list. I have no specific reason to, but it isn't a good association. A decade ago I was active on the Pegasus mail and Mercury lists, and names stood out after a while. Unfortunately on this list, the names stand out for a completely different reason - and its not positive. Just chill, everyone. You never know who's going to interview you in a year. Rick
Reasonably Related Threads
- migration 1.1.7 to 2.0.6
- Can't verify remote server certs without trusted CAs (ssl_client_ca_* settings)
- Bug with 2.2.29-1~auto+25 back to haunt me
- Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x
- [ext] dovecot 2.3.7.2-1~bionic: Performance issues caused by excessive IO to ~/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.tmp