On 2012-11-07 15:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:> On 7.11.2012, at 15.01, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future,
>> I'm curious about what is in store as far as improvements go...
>>
>> Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index
>> updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated indexes is
>> one downside for its implementation...
>
> Nothing really prevents from adding that very easily ..
trivial ? :)
> I guess it
> would need a new setting, which is always the most annoying part of
> small changes. :) I think it would have to have a setting equivalent
> to doveadm index -n parameter, which allows indexing most users,
> except those who pretty much never read their emails. So with doveadm
> index -n 1000 you could set that if the mailbox's \Recent count is
> over 1000, don't index the mailbox. So .. hmm. I guess two settings
> would be cleaner:
>
> plugin {
> fts_autoindex = yes
> fts_autoindex_max_recent = 1000
> }
sounds nice, any plans on the roadmap to actually implement this yet ?
:)
> Or maybe there's a better name than "autoindex" for this
feature.
> SEARCH always autoindexes anyway.
>
>> Also, does the release of Solr 4.0 mean anything for the lucene
>> library used by dovecot?
>
> No, fts-lucene and fts-solr are separate backends. But I do have some
> small plans to add a few more features to fts-solr.
