Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS"
2012 Nov 07
1
Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS
Hi Timo,
As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future, I'm
curious about what is in store as far as improvements go...
Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index
updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated indexes is
one downside for its implementation...
Also, does the release of Solr 4.0 mean anything for the lucene library
2014 Apr 22
0
FTS Lucene: Fatal: master: service(indexer-worker): child * killed with signal 6
Hi List,
Since we migrated from dovecot 1.2.4 to 2.2.12 with lucene as FTS
engine, I have this in my error log:
Apr 22 14:01:14 indexer-worker(username): Error: lucene index
/var/vmail/username/lucene-indexes: IndexWriter() failed (#1): Lock
obtain timed out
Apr 22 14:01:14 indexer-worker: Error: indexer-worker
[username at mydomain.com MailBox-1 - 20800/22707]:
2009 May 06
0
Solr FTS issues (Was fts-solr plugin issue (Marked invalid))
Hi,
Sorry for the change of thread, I just signed up to the list so I couldn't reply to the earlier message.
Let me clarify the issue that Nikolai was describing.
We're running dovecot 1.1.11 and solr 1.4.
The issue is quite simple.
1. I run a search.
2. Dovecot sends a list of emails to solr
3. Solr starts indexing them
4. Solr runs into a "bad" email and we get: SEVERE:
2008 Nov 28
1
Lucene & Solr
Hi all,
I've been asked to prepare a comparison of Lucene/Solr and Xapian and
I'm trying to find some differences between the two. I'm not that
familiar with Lucene myself but I expect there are lots of people who
will have looked at both before ending up on this mailing lists.
Can anyone help? I'm looking for both differences between the two
systems and perhaps the reasons
2012 Oct 15
1
fts = squat solr
I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows
fts = squat solr
so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I
tried
fts = squat lucene
but:
$ doveadm index '*'
doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend
So, is that syntax
2020 May 19
5
FTS-lucene errors : language not available for stemming
I'm getting some log errors with clucene that I am having no luck tracking down on the interwebs.
Errors:
May 19 05:05:16 indexer-worker(gessel at blackrosetech.com)<62971><aPAEI3zLw17A/QAA0J78UA:EF25M3zLw1779QAA0J78UA>: Error: lucene index /mail/blackrosetech.com/gessel//lucene-indexes: IndexWriter::addDocument() failed (#4): language not available for stemming
May 19 05:05:16
2012 Feb 06
2
Possible broken indexer(lucene/solr)?
Hello,
try to use the new 2.1rc and don't get any data in the searchindex.
Tried first lucene, and switched than back so solr.
If I do an search in an mailfolder, i get in the dovecot-log
2012-02-06 22:17:11 | dovecot: |
indexer-worker(xxxxxx): Indexed 0 messages in INBOX/dovecot
Log from solr.
Feb 6, 2012 10:17:11 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: []
2013 Jul 21
1
dovecot fts solr plugin
Hello list,
* apache-solr-3.6.2
* dovecot-2.1.7
I configured fts_solr for dovecot, but I have two issues
When doing a search request within telnet 127.0.0.1 143 it connects to solr.
Jul 21, 2013 4:38:15 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={rows=1&q=box:10361d30f8c4ea51ad7c00002ecaff3b+user:"
tom at
2011 Dec 23
1
Lucene vs Solr with 2.1 single server
For a single server, is the Lucene backend now "better" than running a
Solr server?
--
Daniel
2017 Jan 16
0
fts-solr: Returning 400 on searches; unescaped braces
Michael Welsh Duggan <mwd at md5i.com> writes:
> Using Debian, dovecot-solr 1:2.2.26.0-4, and solr-tomcat 3.6.2+dfsg-9, I
> am getting 400 errors when doing searches. Here is an example search
> query from dovecot that failed (captured with wireshark):
>
> Frame 23: 338 bytes on wire (2704 bits), 338 bytes captured (2704 bits) on interface 0
> Linux cooked capture
2018 Mar 05
0
Dovecot 2.2.34 FTS-SOLR = inconsistent results
Hello,
I'm trying to figure why I have inconsistent results with my fts-solr
powered search:
My test is to find the string "am5oocobey9hait5Wiex8yohgoob9thu" in the
3 emails containing it that I sent to myself:
- Directly on the server:
doveadm search -u username text am5oocobey9hait5Wiex8yohgoob9thu
e2c58a3093235153110800003ea484a8 7937
e2c58a3093235153110800003ea484a8 7938
2018 Jun 07
3
FTS Solr errors using doveadm
Solr 7 returns JSON by default but fts_solr requires XML.
Would be good to have wt=xml added to the query to force it to xml all the time, this would prevent errors if solr has
not had xml set as default for index.
Dovecot 2.2.36
Centos 6
*Doveadm Request:*
doveadm search -u caroline at covermg.com TEXT smith
doveadm(caroline at covermg.com): Error: fts_solr: Invalid XML input at 1:0: not
2016 Dec 19
3
fts-solr: Returning 400 on searches; unescaped braces
Using Debian, dovecot-solr 1:2.2.26.0-4, and solr-tomcat 3.6.2+dfsg-9, I
am getting 400 errors when doing searches. Here is an example search
query from dovecot that failed (captured with wireshark):
Frame 23: 338 bytes on wire (2704 bits), 338 bytes captured (2704 bits) on interface 0
Linux cooked capture
Internet Protocol Version 6, Src: ::1, Dst: ::1
Transmission Control Protocol, Src
2017 Aug 16
0
FTS Lucene Search by Word Parts
Hello,
as the dovecot documentation is only trivial for FTS Search options, I
can't find information on advanced options.
I have enabled it but it seems I can only search for entire words, i.e. the
word Dovecot can be found by searching "dovecot", but not "dove".
Is it possible to achieve this using FTS Lucene?
I know that using Solr that achievable setting n-gram.
2020 Jun 23
2
dovecot fts configuration without solr
Hello All,
I always used dovecot and I'm pretty happy with it, but recently I
changed OS (to ubuntu 18) and to get dovecot LTS with lucene (the
default I was using on my previous arch installation) I needed to build
from source the version 2.3.10 (the one that came with the repos was
older and clucene was not actually supported)
The problem is that the Clucene is not behaving well, It
2012 Jul 25
1
fts-lucene vs SEARCH HEADER
Hello.
This is in Dovecot 2.1.7 on Linux x86, but it looks as though 2.1.8 has the same issue. I'm using fts-lucene. SEARCH HEADER TO returns no results, but SEARCH TO works:
B SEARCH TO TEST
* SEARCH 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 26 27 28 29 31
B OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
C SEARCH HEADER TO TEST
* SEARCH
C OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
Without FTS
2018 Mar 05
1
Re: [enhancement] fts-solr low performance
>Hi,
>
>we have activated fts-solr about a week ago and immediately started to
>experience really *low* performance with MOVE and EXPUNGE commands.
>After several days of googling, tcpdumping and straceing i was able to
>find and resolve the problem.
>
>We are using Dovecot 2.2.27 from Debian Jessie (jessie-backports),
>which is doing a soft commit in solr after
2020 Oct 18
0
v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)
On 10/11/2020 4:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> I'm running,
>
> dovecot --version
> 2.3.11.3 (502c39af9)
>
> solr -version
> 8.6.3
<snip>
> Attempting to test/debug from from cmd line,
>
> doveadm fts lookup -u myuser at example.com body "tambien"
>
> causes a PANIC
I am a committer on the lucene-solr project. So I know that product
2015 Dec 04
0
FTS solr issue.
Hello Dovecot admins,
I seem to have a problem ever since recent upgrades to dovecot. The solr
engine complains about some variable not being long. Although it does not
say which variable. I havve updated the solr-schema.xml file from current
dovecot install 2.2.15 !
Any ideas would be very helpful
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
2020 Jun 23
0
dovecot fts configuration without solr
I am interested to know what problem you face on fts-xapian ( I am the
developer)
On 2020-06-23 12:39, Danilo Tomasoni wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I always used dovecot and I'm pretty happy with it, but recently I changed OS (to ubuntu 18) and to get dovecot LTS with lucene (the default I was using on my previous arch installation) I needed to build from source the version 2.3.10