Should I just make Dovecot lowercase usernames by default in v2.0? auth_username_format = %Lu Does anyone actually want to use non-lowercase usernames? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090709/0a067b11/attachment.bin
On 07/10/2009 12:15 AM Timo Sirainen wrote:> Should I just make Dovecot lowercase usernames by default in v2.0? > > auth_username_format = %Lu > > Does anyone actually want to use non-lowercase usernames?As long as it keeps still configurable, why not. It can avoid much annoyance for people in a rush. Just my 2? Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: decade.0919100 at localdomain.org
On 7/9/2009, Timo Sirainen (tss at iki.fi) wrote:> Should I just make Dovecot lowercase usernames by default in v2.0? > > auth_username_format = %Lu > > Does anyone actually want to use non-lowercase usernames?I *always* lowercase usernames for everything I manage... So I vote yes... :) -- Best regards, Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Pascal Volk wrote:>> Does anyone actually want to use non-lowercase usernames? > > As long as it keeps still configurable, why not. It can avoid much > annoyance for people in a rush.My opinion, too. Bye, - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBSlcM6nWSIuGy1ktrAQLXkQgAmec3M1QnIHo6+PK/tS3vMRoqlyPZNJxL i+C8rBhSUg8yN3AunHSZpkt5eFAPi5Uncw76ksxeg5f3xWww/lz1/EQu9JhynMe1 2qlCAz2j03UJYlacLzhcRPn0tL2+o++ayq0FPeqgGKpAe4nnO+HdfqBTVfF3t5de KKZUxykfaz1AwGqoq/1YSSImVwysiGcwGX0mhltpxg+sfAZHSFaOmvn1QFEQHqR8 BvdZe/jWIrhH2wXBuMEwXellR3JpE+ba/gAer3Z4OwuHEHTO7UjWUfAeOh+52FXQ zepJOcrEo0152Nf4ch/pWKEPu0wtwnCKaltdMK26QZHiaZ/Q8oCC3A==kMib -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----