1) I see that the --without-pop3d option has gone away. What does this imply, i.e why was that done? Is there some other way that you now avoid compiling the POP code? Are there any other discontinued options? 2) There was some talk a while back about changing how and where the plugins were to be built and their code located. Was this implemented? If so, is there any doc on it? -- ==== Once upon a time, the Internet was a friendly, neighbors-helping-neighbors small town, and no one locked their doors. Now it's like an apartment in Bed-Stuy: you need three heavy duty pick-proof locks, one of those braces that goes from the lock to the floor, and bars on the windows.... ==== Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Bard College, New York 12504 sdean at bard.edu voice: 845-758-7475, fax: 845-758-7035
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 14:39 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:> 1) I see that the --without-pop3d option has gone away. What does this > imply, i.e why was that done? Is there some other way that you now > avoid compiling the POP code? Are there any other discontinued options?If you don't want to use pop3, just don't enable pop3. It doesn't matter that it gets compiled. --without-deliver is also gone.> 2) There was some talk a while back about changing how and where the > plugins were to be built and their code located. Was this > implemented? If so, is there any doc on it?I don't remember anything like this.. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090709/6bbdd3a0/attachment.bin