dovecot - Jan 2009 - Per-namespace proxying?

Hello,

Searching in the archives, I saw the following posting from Timo Sirainen:

[Dovecot] Roadmap to future (06 Dec 2007):
[...]
> Proxying
> --------
>
> - These could be implemented to v1.2. - Log in normally (no proxying)
> if destination IP is the server itself.
>
> - Support for per-namespace proxying:
>
> namespace public {
>   prefix = Public/
>   location = proxy:public.example.org
> }
>
> There are two choices for this: Dummy IMAP proxying or handling it with
> a mail storage backend. Dummy IMAP proxying would just let the remote
server
> whose mailbox is currently selected handle most of the commands and their
> replies. I'm just afraid that this will become problematic in future.
>
... (continues)

Was this feature ever implemented? Is it in the 1.2 alphas?

On a related note, were virtual mailboxes implemented?

Thanks,

Van

?On Jan 2, 2009, at 11:31 AM, VanL wrote:
>> - These could be implemented to v1.2. - Log in normally (no proxying)
>> if destination IP is the server itself.
>>
>> - Support for per-namespace proxying:
>>
>> namespace public {
>>  prefix = Public/
>>  location = proxy:public.example.org
>> }
>>
>> There are two choices for this: Dummy IMAP proxying or handling it  
>> with
>> a mail storage backend. Dummy IMAP proxying would just let the  
>> remote server
>> whose mailbox is currently selected handle most of the commands and  
>> their
>> replies. I'm just afraid that this will become problematic in
future.
>>
> ... (continues)
>
> Was this feature ever implemented? Is it in the 1.2 alphas?
No.
> On a related note, were virtual mailboxes implemented?
Yes, in v1.2.