search for: sirainen

* Thomas Leuxner <tlx at leuxner.net> 2017.07.19 14:29: It seems to have a new side effect which I haven't noticed upfront as it does not produce logging in Dovecot: Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 io_loop_extract_notify_fd (ioloop=0x563456973540) at ioloop-notify-inotify.c:224 224 ioloop-notify-inotify.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full #0

...y up from the link on the wiki page at http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/Installation). With one client using the mailbox dovecot-crlf (http://www.dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-crlf) I get messages like: Error: test at npsl.co.uk[67]: 1035253882.5041.34.camel at hurina: Header From changed 'Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi' (len 52) -> 'Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>' (len 26): * 1 FETCH (UID 2093 FLAGS () BODY ("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL "7bit" 913 0) BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (Fr...

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :) People wanting new features should start testing the upcoming v1.1. http://dovecot.org/nightly/

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :) People wanting new features should start testing the upcoming v1.1. http://dovecot.org/nightly/

...ters, would sincerely like to thank the developers of Dovecot. For, if it were not for you, we would be stuck with Courier and would not have the impressive features of Sieve, as opposed to the unmanageable scripts, by end users, of maildrop. *Our gratitude goes to, but not limited to:* *Timo Sirainen and Charles Marcus* *We apologize if we have missed anyone and ask that EVERYONE using dovecot would express their thanks and gratitude by signing this thread, to also include any people beyond the mentioned.* Please, Mr. Sirainen, make a donation link as we have tried to find one on dovecot....

v0.99.11 2004-09-04 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> + 127.* and ::1 IP addresses are treated as secured with disable_plaintext_auth = yes + auth_debug setting for extra authentication debugging + Some documentation and error message updates + Create PID file in /var/run/dovecot/master.pid + home setting is now optional...

Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test.c Type: text/x-csrc Size: 1100 bytes Desc: not available URL:

...the same delivery code, but just in case I added also "lmtp / with sieve fileinto box" test and it passes as well. > On 25. Feb 2020, at 15.38, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > This is with lmtp if it matters. > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 7:37 AM Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com <mailto:timo at sirainen.com>> wrote: > On 25. Feb 2020, at 4.55, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com <mailto:larryrtx at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I have auto-subscribe turned on, but I had to doveadm mailbox subscribe to a LDA/Sieve...

On 13. Aug 2020, at 11.29, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > > On 13. Aug 2020, at 11.00, Arjen de Korte <build+dovecot at de-korte.org> wrote: >> >> I allow users to run 'doveadm' for mailbox maintenance (to expunge mail for instance). Since the upgrade to 2.3.11.3, this no longer works...

Do you think I'd break a lot of people's filters if I removed the prefix? :) Anyone strongly for/against removing it? It seems kind of annoying to me whenever I happen to think about it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

Where do you think the following binaries should be installed to? The possible locations are: - bin/ - sbin/ - libexec/dovecot/ (or lib/dovecot/ in most Linux distros) So the binaries are: 1) These probably belong to bin/ or sbin/ or both: - authtest - dovecotpw - doveadm 2) Binaries that you might want to call from mail_executable setting: - rawlog - gdbhelper 3) Index file dumping

On 28 Apr 2015, at 11:35, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 28 Apr 2015, at 04:15, Edwardo Garcia <wdgarc88 at gmail.com> wrote: >> When can we expect 2.2.17 to resolve this? > > As far as I know this doesn't affect any of the major distributions where Dovecot is commonly used (Debian/Ubuntu/...

I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg, Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's some talk about it: http://mailtrust.com/blog (A bit stupid looking picture, but then again all my pictures seem to be that way so I didn't bother getting a new one

I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg, Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's some talk about it: http://mailtrust.com/blog (A bit stupid looking picture, but then again all my pictures seem to be that way so I didn't bother getting a new one

After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers. But any comments on which one is better: a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.YYYYMMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable) b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable) With a) style the releases could be done by simply copying a nightly snapshot to releases/ directory and announcing the changes since the last

I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned by the creator by default in practically all countries, there's no need to advertise it everywhere. Can anyone think of reasons why this wouldn't be a good ide...

...rote: > > > * Thomas Leuxner <tlx at leuxner.net> 2017.07.19 14:29: > > It seems to have a new side effect which I haven't noticed upfront as it does not produce logging in Dovecot: > Should be fixed with commit 81e832796cdc6af790ed7be8a6c150889f03171c Author: Timo Sirainen <timo.sirainen at dovecot.fi> Date: Wed Jul 19 23:19:12 2017 +0300 virtual: Optimize mailbox_notify_changes() when there's only a single backend mailbox commit 2044eb7652b864a05842933e9097c583cb11256c Author: Timo Sirainen <timo.sirainen at dovecot.fi> Date: Wed Jul 19 23:...

On 29. Mar 2020, at 17.07, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > >> This is what the log says in the moment of crashing: >> dovecot: lmtp(53852): Panic: Module context mail_crypt_user_module missing >> *** backtrace *** (see: https://pastebin.com/YCiFtxmy) > > It shows mailbox_free() in the backt...

On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 15:57, Timo Sirainen wrote: > One more reason to make all logging go through dovecot-master process.. > > Temporary fix of course is setting login_chroot = no to config file. Thanks, Timo, that did the trick. Also thanks to Quentin for his reply, though I don't understand any of it. As stated, my knowl...

This has been in my TODO for a while and today I implemented it (but didn't dare to test it yet :) So the problem has been that you want to run for example: doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 7d doveadm purge -A This is annoying because it scans through the users' mailboxes twice, wasting disk IO and CPU. So how to make it do the scan only once? The syntax I thought of today