On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 09:22 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:> I have my master IMAP server running DC V1.0.10. The homedir and
> INBOXdir are physically resident there and NFS exported (no caching) to
> 3 other machines. I have installed V1.1beta13 on one of them (which
> thus accesses the homedir/INBOXdir remotely) and plan to have a limited
> community test-drive it there. Are there any hazards or drawbacks in
> doing this? While the homedirs and INBOXdirs are thus shared, I have it
> so that each machine has its own local index directory and /var/run
> dir. Comments or dire warnings?
If indexes are separate, there should be nothing to worry about.
Although with the beta13 machine you could enable NFS attribute cache
and set mail_nfs_storage=yes. If there are no bugs it should improve
performance.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20080111/9dc3bf99/attachment-0002.bin>