Any suggestions as to what license to use for wiki.dovecot.org? I should have specified this a long time ago, but luckily(?) most of the content is written by me, so I don't think there are going to be problems. The main choices are: a) GNU Free Documentation License b) Creative Commons (Attribution-Share Alike?) It could also be dual-licensed to both to maximize the distribution possibilities. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071216/33847678/attachment-0002.bin>
On 2007-12-16 22:43:18 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:> a) GNU Free Documentation License > > b) Creative Commons (Attribution-Share Alike?) > > It could also be dual-licensed to both to maximize the distribution > possibilities.CC Share Alike 3 GFDL has some sucking part about the license when using parts of the documentation. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org
Timo Sirainen, on 12/16/2007 3:43 PM, said the following:> Any suggestions as to what license to use for wiki.dovecot.org?>> a) GNU Free Documentation License > > b) Creative Commons (Attribution-Share Alike?)I like CC better personally... -- Best regards, Charles