Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007 schrieb Luigi Rosa:> "It's also not a good idea to build the plugin against
self-compiled
> Dovecot sources, but then actually use a prebuilt binary package of
> Dovecot."
> Why isn't a good idea?
In this case there there's a significant probability that either the
plugin was compiled against a different dovecot version, using a
different compiler than the dovecot build and/or using different shared
library versions to link against, each of which can lead to obscure and
hard to debug misbehaviour / "bugs", which could be easily avoided.
So either use both programs as prepackaged binaries which belong together,
or build both yourself from the same sources, using the same compiler and
the same library versions.
Greetings,
Gunter
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Plankton lobbyist: "NUKE THE WHALES!"
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ PGP-verschl?sselte Mails bevorzugt! +
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070511/88e68eee/attachment.bin>