dovecot - Apr 2006 - Fedora 4: x86_64 different build options than i386?

After successful testing on our 32-bit machine using the rpm, I'm
installing dovecot on our Fedora 64-bit machine using that rpm.  In
the log file I get:

dovecot: Mar 31 15:34:16 Error: auth(default): Unknown database driver
'mysql'

I see this:

# dovecot --build-options
Build options: ioloop=poll dnotify ipv6 openssl
Passdb: checkpassword pam passwd passwd-file shadow 
Userdb: checkpassword passwd passwd-file static 

and dovecot is in:

/usr/local/sbin/dovecot

But on my 32-bit Fedora machine, also installed from the rpm, I get this:

# dovecot --build-options
Build options: ioloop=poll dnotify ipv6 openssl mysql postgresql sqlite
Passdb: checkpassword ldap pam passwd passwd-file shadow sql 
Userdb: checkpassword ldap passwd passwd-file sql static 

and dovecot is in:

/usr/sbin

Shouldn't the 64-bit machine have the same build-options?

What can I do to make it right?  Do I *have* to build it from a
tarball?

Charlie Davis

Fixed this by getting the latest x86_64 rpm from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams'
repository.

Sorry for the email. :D

-Charlie Davis

----- On Friday, March 31, 2006 fishgills at fishgills.net wrote:
> After successful testing on our 32-bit machine using the rpm, I'm
> installing dovecot on our Fedora 64-bit machine using that rpm.  In
> the log file I get:
> 
> dovecot: Mar 31 15:34:16 Error: auth(default): Unknown database driver
'mysql'
> 
> I see this:
> 
> # dovecot --build-options
> Build options: ioloop=poll dnotify ipv6 openssl
> Passdb: checkpassword pam passwd passwd-file shadow
> Userdb: checkpassword passwd passwd-file static
> 
> and dovecot is in:
> 
> /usr/local/sbin/dovecot
> 
> But on my 32-bit Fedora machine, also installed from the rpm, I get this:
> 
> # dovecot --build-options
> Build options: ioloop=poll dnotify ipv6 openssl mysql postgresql sqlite
> Passdb: checkpassword ldap pam passwd passwd-file shadow sql
> Userdb: checkpassword ldap passwd passwd-file sql static
> 
> and dovecot is in:
> 
> /usr/sbin
> 
> Shouldn't the 64-bit machine have the same build-options?
> 
> What can I do to make it right?  Do I *have* to build it from a
> tarball?
> 
> Charlie Davis

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:32 -0800, fishgills at fishgills.net
wrote:
> After successful testing on our 32-bit machine using the rpm, I'm
> installing dovecot on our Fedora 64-bit machine using that rpm.  In
> the log file I get:
It was previously broken. Which specific package did you install?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060331/bfec2f22/attachment.bin>

Yeah, I got your latest from your website. Google's top return for you was
an older release. Using your .5 I believe it is. For x86_64 of course. It works
fine now.

----- On Friday, March 31, 2006 ivazquez at ivazquez.net wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:32 -0800, fishgills at fishgills.net wrote:
>> After successful testing on our 32-bit machine using the rpm, I'm
>> installing dovecot on our Fedora 64-bit machine using that rpm.  In
>> the log file I get:
> 
> It was previously broken. Which specific package did you install?
> 
> --
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/
> 
> gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Tere.
> What can I do to make it right?  Do I *have* to build it from a
> tarball?
>
>   
Get the source rpm, install it, edit the spec file and build the new binary.

-- 
Sysadmin