I just tested dovecot-stable from 2005-03-08 and 03-12 and saw the following behavior. All of my mbox folders show is the first message's header. None of the files were truncated (whew, saves a restore). I had 0.99.12.1 installed before this, and just switched back to 0.99.14. Both 0.99.x versions work fine. I removed all of the index files to see if there was a hiccup there, with no effect. System is Slackware 10.0. My package was built with this: http://tinyurl.com/6l2vv
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 23:34 -0500, Matt Howard wrote:> I just tested dovecot-stable from 2005-03-08 and 03-12 and saw the > following behavior. All of my mbox folders show is the first message's > header. None of the files were truncated (whew, saves a restore). I > had 0.99.12.1 installed before this, and just switched back to 0.99.14. > Both 0.99.x versions work fine. I removed all of the index files to > see if there was a hiccup there, with no effect. System is Slackware > 10.0. My package was built with this: http://tinyurl.com/6l2vvWhat IMAP client did you use? kmail doesn't work with it.. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050314/52292c5a/attachment-0001.bin>
Timo Sirainen wrote:>On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 23:34 -0500, Matt Howard wrote: > > >>I just tested dovecot-stable from 2005-03-08 and 03-12 and saw the >>following behavior. All of my mbox folders show is the first message's >>header. None of the files were truncated (whew, saves a restore). I >>had 0.99.12.1 installed before this, and just switched back to 0.99.14. >> Both 0.99.x versions work fine. I removed all of the index files to >>see if there was a hiccup there, with no effect. System is Slackware >>10.0. My package was built with this: http://tinyurl.com/6l2vv >> >> > >What IMAP client did you use? kmail doesn't work with it.. > > >Oh, snap! I didn't even think about that. I just knew that I had the account configured in KMail and used it. I even had Thunderbird already running. Do you know if this is misbehavior on KMail's part? I can work on getting it corrected. Thanks, Matt Howard <mhoward at hattmoward.org>