CentOS - Oct 2018 - Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?

Why do you say so?


________________________________
From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Itamar Reis
Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 12:04 PM
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free
Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?


On 10/31/18 12:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good morning from Singapore,
>
> This is of paramount importance. Would Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL),
CentOS, and Fedora remain open source/free software after IBM buys Red Hat for
$34 Billion?
yes, because closing the code is the same as burning $34 Billion.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

On 10/30/2018 9:12 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Why do you say so?
>
> On 10/31/18 12:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>> Good morning from Singapore,
>>
>> This is of paramount importance. Would Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL),
CentOS, and Fedora remain open source/free software after IBM buys Red Hat for
$34 Billion?
> yes, because closing the code is the same as burning $34 Billion.
Think of it this way: A company specializing in 10 year support for an 
operating environment is being bought by a company specializing in 25-30 
year support for an operating environment. Enterprise Linux -- and thus 
any derivative, like CentOS -- is not going away any time soon.

Fedora's value is far more in the technology aggregation (IMO) than 
support. IBM isn't <some other company that shall remain nameless> and
thus I don't think the project is any danger, but Fedora would be 
workably forkable if it really came down to it.

-jc

If I heard/remember correctly, AT&T's UNIX was proprietary but they
released it to academic institutions under NDA and were lax in enforcement.  We
all know what happened. In this case it's obviously open source, we know
what will happen if someone tries something.  My main concern is future
development, will it remain open source.  My real fear is that a certain
un-named company is going to feel pressured to buy Canonical.

My surprise is that no one is commenting on the price IMB is offering, a 60-70%
premium, that in and of itself seems risky.


Leroy Tennison
Network Information/Cyber Security Specialist
E: leroy at datavoiceint.com
2220 Bush Dr
McKinney, Texas
75070
www.datavoiceint.com
TThis message has been sent on behalf
of a company that is part of the Harris Operating Group of
Constellation Software Inc. These companies are listed
here
.
If you prefer not to be contacted by Harris
Operating Group
please notify us
.
This message is intended exclusively for the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication
may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are
not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print,
retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the
message.

________________________________________
From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Japheth Cleaver
<cleaver at terabithia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 11:15 PM
To: CentOS mailing list; Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open
Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?

On 10/30/2018 9:12 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Why do you say so?
>
> On 10/31/18 12:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>> Good morning from Singapore,
>>
>> This is of paramount importance. Would Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL),
CentOS, and Fedora remain open source/free software after IBM buys Red Hat for
$34 Billion?
> yes, because closing the code is the same as burning $34 Billion.
Think of it this way: A company specializing in 10 year support for an
operating environment is being bought by a company specializing in 25-30
year support for an operating environment. Enterprise Linux -- and thus
any derivative, like CentOS -- is not going away any time soon.

Fedora's value is far more in the technology aggregation (IMO) than
support. IBM isn't <some other company that shall remain nameless> and
thus I don't think the project is any danger, but Fedora would be
workably forkable if it really came down to it.

-jc

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos