wwp wrote:>>> >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be >>> released during the next cycle. >>> >>> >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: >> >> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR. > > Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we > could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6?Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ... James Pearson
Hello James, On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:06:59 +0000 James Pearson <james-p at moving-picture.com> wrote:> wwp wrote: > >>> > >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on > >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be > >>> released during the next cycle. > >>> > >>> > >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: > >> > >> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR. > > > > Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we > > could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6? > > Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ...Hah. Good news! Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170420/0b14b03c/attachment-0001.sig>
On 04/20/2017 09:06 AM, James Pearson wrote:> wwp wrote: >>>> >>>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on >>>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be >>>> released during the next cycle. >>>> >>>> >>> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: >>> >>> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR. >> >> Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we >> could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6? > > Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ... >Right, that version is out there now for CentOS and it installs and passes our CI testing, here is the latest run for this firefox: http://bit.ly/2obFsd1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170421/938497e5/attachment-0001.sig>
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:12:17 +0200 wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote:> Hello James, > > > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:06:59 +0000 James Pearson <james-p at moving-picture.com> wrote: > > > wwp wrote: > > >>> > > >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on > > >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be > > >>> released during the next cycle. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: > > >> > > >> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR. > > > > > > Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we > > > could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6? > > > > Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ... > > Hah. Good news!In fact, not really good news. Firefox 52 is damn slow compared to 45. Every major upgrade shows a slower Firefox, what's wrong w/ it? Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170503/d19f86fe/attachment-0001.sig>