search for: felt

Dear WizaRds, I would like to fit a curve to ten points with nls() for one unknown parameter gamma in the Kahnemann/ Tversky function, but somehow it won't work and I am unable to locate my mistake. p.kum <- seq(0.1,1, by=0.1) felt.prob.kum <- c(0.16, 0.23, 0.36, 0.49, 0.61, 0.71, 0.85, 0.89, 0.95, 1) ## how to find a function that fits these points nicely? plot(p.kum, felt.prob.kum) ## looks a little like an "S" gamma <- rep(0.5, 10) nls.dataframe <- data.frame(p.kum,felt.prob.kum, gamma) nls.kurve <...

Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >> written in pure shell script, so no python dependencies. >> https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh > > Thanks - I might look at that, but as Ralph mentions in h...

I know, this probably isn't the right place for it, but, I was just finding the nth use for syslinux and thinking yet again just how handy these tools are and just felt like saying it. Thanks for all your hard work Mr. Anvin in providing not just a massively useful tool that's open to all to use for free, but, even supporting this tool so well.

...cash". He is in no way a shady guy, having dealt with this situation with the utmost of professionalism and courtesy with me. He is also obviously not threatened by any of my work and feels no pressure to compete with me, infect his work into mine, or any of the other statements he so quickly felt slighted by. And again, sincere apologies all around to anyone who''s felt he was in the right and I''m a bad guy. I shall use my power to influence people more appropriately with rational technical comparisons from now on. Hopefully, this will put a final end to any misconceptio...

On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt: >> On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> Does your build end at some particular point? >> See **** DETAILS **** for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report. >>> >>> Aki >> >> I would guess this is not "c99" way... > > It seems to...

a) google: "dovecot imap configuration" brought an article from 2005 as the first item: while I like debian and a bit of history you may want to ask yourself how to improve your site as the primary hit from google. FYI: years ago I had great results in the top of google searches - and then I made a major error - I moved my site to a new url and google forgot me. b) using your

...says it is a known type root at x064:[/data/prj/openbsd/openssh/openssh-6.8p1]./ssh-keygen -? unknown option -- ? usage: ssh-keygen [-q] [-b bits] [-t dsa | ecdsa | ed25519 | rsa | rsa1] [-N new_passphrase] [-C comment] [-f output_keyfile] ... What did I miss? regards, Michael Felt p.s. make check|tests - they all passed. p.p.s. - this is built against an ancient openssl, so maybe the problem is there. OpenSSH_6.8p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 And, yes - I know I newer openssl is much better, but this is taking a system where it is at - i.e., I assume openssl is not yet up...

...r sometime and I need some help in parsing some data. There is a column called "Duration" which has data like following: 2 minutes => 120 2 min => 120 10 seconds =>10 2 hrs =>7200 2-3 minutes => 150 or 120 5 minutes (when i arrived => 300 Flyby approx 20 sec. => 20 felt like 10 mins but tim => 600 I need to convert them to numerics as given. Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated. Thanks Susanta [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 13/10/2017 15:29, Michael Felt wrote: > This verifies it is xauth related: > > debug3: sending debug message: No xauth program; cannot forward with > spoofing. > > so, added an extra debug - and this is what I see: > > debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 req x11-req > debug3: setup_x11fwd: xa...

...ebsite but you seemed to only have .zip files. That's very odd; normally on Unix we don't ship .zip files). More generally: Do all R packages automatically run on Unix, or are we fragmenting the CRAN code base into Unix and non-Unix packages? One of my reasons for shifting to R was that it felt like a system that was built by Unix people (roots in Bell Labs etc.). So it will have a function like sink() as a nice counterpart to a function like source() :-) Ox, for example, has nice functionality but it felt like it was done by Windows guys, so it wasn't going to be useful to me, and I...

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > Hmm, it felt nicer to mark raw LLVM pointers as roots and then transform > > them, since I then didn't have to see the overhead in my frontend :). > > I'm not sure what overhead you mean. I think I should have emphasized "felt", since it only would make me produce less code in the...

...t;people that have just > been offended, rightly or wrongly, are understandably emotionally > unstable". I've indeed no argument with how you've phrased that idea. The motivation for responding as I did above was two-fold. First, the idea to which I was responding--as phrased--felt like a Kafka trap: YOU have transgressed. WE don't have to tell you why. The accusation is the evidence. etc. Second, I wondered if adopting the language of 'offensive' and 'unsafe' might help illustrate the point that anyone can claim to be triggered by something. (I...

Hi, Thank you David. My question was from a machine independent code analyzer/optimizer perspective where types are of less importance. Hence I felt difficult to understand the IR with the types. Rekha On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 27 Oct 2014, at 12:46, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > > > Why wasn't the C style of explicit declaration o...

On 23 April 2018 at 19:49, Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> wrote: [...] > run test agent.sh ... [...] > Question: I have not dug into the tests yet. Will copy to a "local" > directory, and not build out of tree and see if that fixes it (as it does > for many other packages). However, just in case it do...

wwp wrote: >>> >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be >>> released during the next cycle. >>> >>> >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: >> >...

...ons are type annotated. Why wasn't the C style of explicit declaration of variables (or values in LLVM context) followed by their uses model not adopted here? or may be even annotate the value (result of the Instruction) with type rather than annotating each operands on the Instruction? Just felt that by annotating each operand with types may make the Instruction 'complex' to understand. May be I am wrong. Thanks for any explanation, -- Rekha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/201...

...gt; wrote: > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) >>> Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >>>> >>>>>> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >>>>>> written in pure shell script, so no python dependencies. >>>>>> https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh...

Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > However, it is incredibly > important to not expect or demand that a person *you have made feel > unsafe* take the time to explain why. I feel what you have written here to be offensive to the highest degree, and your words make me feel unsafe when contemplating their effect on my prospects for future interaction with this community.

Hi everyone, I have felt for quite some time that during my regular LLVM workflow, CMake recompiles a lot of files after I update to the latest ToT (which I do more than once per week). Of course, this wasn't really based on any real data, just felt like every time I update (even if it's a day or two later), we end...

...s" is being used somewhat differently in the context of the nlme package. Toby -- ************************************************************************** When Thomas Edison invented the light bulb he tried over 2000 experiments before he got it to work. A young reporter asked him how it felt to have failed so many times. He said "I never failed once. I invented the light bulb. It just happened to be a 2000-step process."