Am 10.10.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>:> On 10/09/2016 06:15 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 09.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>: >>> On 10/9/2016 5:33 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> look in /root :) anaconda-ks.conf is a generated ks file for >>> the options you chose during that system's installation. >> >> >> :-) I had the creation of a EL6 livemedia in mind ... >> > > They live in a different branch: > > http://bit.ly/2dFmXJBOh, so close that I haven't seen it. Thank you! -- LF
On 10/10/2016 09:27 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:> Am 10.10.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: >> On 10/09/2016 06:15 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 09.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>: >>>> On 10/9/2016 5:33 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>>> >>>> look in /root :) anaconda-ks.conf is a generated ks file for >>>> the options you chose during that system's installation. >>> >>> >>> :-) I had the creation of a EL6 livemedia in mind ... >>> >> >> They live in a different branch: >> >> http://bit.ly/2dFmXJB > > > Oh, so close that I haven't seen it. Thank you!Not that you are doing this .. BUT .. please remember that if one uses packages not created and signed by CentOS team (or an ISO not spun by an approved SIG) then the compose IS NOT CENTOS .. That you can not add in your own stuff and compose and distribute and still call the ISO CentOS. We do want people to use CentOS as a basis for installing their community software, so we want people to use CentOS AND add their stuff properly. Just not on a single install where it looks like the CentOS Project is providing the ISO. So, a normal install followed by an install of 'Your Software' is 'Your Software' 'on CentOS Linux' .. not CentOS Linux. It is only CentOS if the first install completes and only things created by the CentOS team or an authorized SIG is in that install. You can label you own local spins however you want .. but if you are distributing it, please follow our guidelines: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20161011/c9f6fbda/attachment-0001.sig>
Am 11.10.2016 um 15:36 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>:> On 10/10/2016 09:27 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 10.10.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: >>> On 10/09/2016 06:15 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> They live in a different branch: >>> >>> http://bit.ly/2dFmXJB >> >> >> Oh, so close that I haven't seen it. Thank you! > > Not that you are doing this .. BUT .. please remember that if one uses > packages not created and signed by CentOS team (or an ISO not spun by an > approved SIG) then the compose IS NOT CENTOS .. That you can not add in > your own stuff and compose and distribute and still call the ISO CentOS. > > We do want people to use CentOS as a basis for installing their > community software, so we want people to use CentOS AND add their stuff > properly. > > Just not on a single install where it looks like the CentOS Project is > providing the ISO. So, a normal install followed by an install of 'Your > Software' is 'Your Software' 'on CentOS Linux' .. not CentOS Linux. It > is only CentOS if the first install completes and only things created by > the CentOS team or an authorized SIG is in that install. > > You can label you own local spins however you want .. but if you are > distributing it, please follow our guidelines: > > https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/Its good to keep this communicated. Personally I want compose a livemedia for a bare-metal recovery scenario ... -- LF