Displaying 20 results from an estimated 227 matches for "spun".
Did you mean:
spin
2015 Jan 30
5
Very slow disk I/O
On 1/30/2015 1:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 05:07 AM, Jatin Davey wrote:
>> Yes , it is a SATA disk. I am not sure of the speed. Can you tell me
>> how to find out this information ? Additionally we are using RAID 10
>> configuration with 4 disks.
>
> What RAID controller are you using?
>
> # lspci | grep RAID
[Jatin]
[root at localhost ~]# lspci |
2016 Feb 16
3
slightly off-topic, RAID program for on-board SAS 2308-4i ?
Does anyone know what program can be used to query the RAID status
from the OS for an on-board LSI SAS 2308-4i?
On this page:
http://docs.avagotech.com/docs/12351997
there is a curious note on the left that reads:
"Integrated MegaRAID support available upon request"
After one mostly fruitless round of chatting with LSI/Avago/Broadcom
and one completely fruitless round of chatting
2015 Jan 30
0
Very slow disk I/O
...--
-- ID | Type | Size | Status | InProgress
volume c0u0 | RAID1 1x2 | 2727G | Optimal | None
volume c0u1 | RAID6 1x8 | 16370G | Optimal | None
volume c0u2 | RAID6 1x8 | 16370G | Optimal | None
-- Disks --
-- Encl:Slot | vol-span-unit | Model | Status
disk 8:0 | 0-0-0 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:1 | 0-0-1 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:2 | 1-0-0 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:3 | 1-0-1 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:4 | 1-0-2 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:5 | 1-0-3 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:6 | 1-0-4 | ST...
2016 Feb 16
0
slightly off-topic, RAID program for on-board SAS 2308-4i ?
...Type | Size | Status | InProgress
volume c0u0 | RAID10 1x2 | 2727G | Optimal | None
volume c0u1 | RAID60 1x8 | 16370G | Optimal | None
volume c0u2 | RAID60 1x8 | 16370G | Optimal | None
-- Disks --
-- Encl:Slot | vol-span-unit | Model | Status
disk 8:0 | 0-0-0 | Z291VTS5ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:1 | 0-0-1 | Z291VTRPST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:2 | 1-0-0 | Z291VTKWST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:3 | 1-0-1 | Z291VT9YST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:4 | 1-0-2 | Z291VTT6ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
disk 8:5 | 1-0-3 | Z291VT6CST33000650NS 0003...
2015 Feb 02
1
Very slow disk I/O
...InProgress
> volume c0u0 | RAID1 1x2 | 2727G | Optimal | None
> volume c0u1 | RAID6 1x8 | 16370G | Optimal | None
> volume c0u2 | RAID6 1x8 | 16370G | Optimal | None
>
> -- Disks --
> -- Encl:Slot | vol-span-unit | Model | Status
> disk 8:0 | 0-0-0 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 8:1 | 0-0-1 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 8:2 | 1-0-0 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 8:3 | 1-0-1 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 8:4 | 1-0-2 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 8:5 | 1-0-3 | ST33000650NS 0003 | Online, Spun...
2014 Aug 25
3
Hardware raid health?
I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both
drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it
from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of
the art in linux software monitoring for this? Long ago when that
box was set up I think the best I could have done was a Java GUI tool
that IBM had for their servers - and that seemed like
2017 Nov 02
3
low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations
On Thursday 02 November 2017 14:10:25 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> If you want raid 5 or 6, then you should get a hardware controller. For
> raid 1, mdadm should work just fine.? I would suggest trying it before
> buying a raid controller.? If it works for you, you save a few hundred
> dollars and you have one less piece of hardware to worry about.
>
> I haven't looked at them in
2020 Sep 09
0
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
...sdr | None |None
Miloslav> -- Disk information --
Miloslav> -- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status
Miloslav> | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID
Miloslav> c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online,
Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32
Miloslav> c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online,
Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12
Miloslav> c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online,
Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 4...
2020 Sep 09
4
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
...> Miloslav> -- Disk information --
> Miloslav> -- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status
> Miloslav> | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID
> Miloslav> c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online,
> Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32
> Miloslav> c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online,
> Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12
> Miloslav> c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online,
> Miloslav> Spun...
2020 Sep 07
4
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
...RAID-0 | 838G | 256 KB | RA,WB | Enabled | Optimal |
/dev/sdr | None |None
-- Disk information --
-- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status
| Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID
c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online,
Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32
c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online,
Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12
c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online,
Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C | [8:1] | 11
c0u3p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060C...
2020 Sep 09
0
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
...> Miloslav> -- Disk information --
> Miloslav> -- ID?? | Type | Drive
Model?????????????????????? | Size???? |
Status
> Miloslav>?????? | Speed????| Temp | Slot ID??| LSI ID
> Miloslav> c0u0p0??| HDD??| SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3??|
837.8 Gb | Online,
> Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C??| [8:14]?? | 32
> Miloslav> c0u1p0??| HDD??| HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ |
558.4 Gb | Online,
> Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C??| [8:0]????| 12
> Miloslav> c0u2p0??| HDD??| HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J |
558.4 Gb | Online,
> Miloslav> Spun...
2015 Feb 03
3
Very slow disk I/O
On 2/2/2015 8:11 PM, Jatin Davey wrote:
> disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
> disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
> End of Output **************************
>
> Let me know if i need to chang...
2020 Sep 09
0
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
...dr | None |None
>>
Miloslav> -- Disk information --
Miloslav> -- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status
Miloslav> | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID
Miloslav> c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online,
Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32
Miloslav> c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online,
Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12
Miloslav> c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online,
Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C...
2005 Oct 27
4
monolithic versus modules
I spun a new xen kernel from pristine sources using modules, had the
APCI errors and scsi timeouts.
I took pristine source and spun a monolithic kernel and everything
appears to be working.
gcc version 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2)
if it matter.
xen_changeset : Wed Oct 26 11:59:13 2005 +0100 7500:...
2015 Nov 24
2
Any risk in sparsifying a base image (that has a snapshot on top of it)
...e
deleted blocks in the base can be sparsified, since they are either still
deleted on the snap (which is fine) or were written in the snap (which is
fine either and does not change or matter for the base image).
Can I assume sparsifying should not make any changes that matter for a VM
that will be spun (post the process)?
TIA,
Y.
2015 Feb 03
0
Very slow disk I/O
...o
-- Controllers --
-- ID | Model
c0 | Cisco 12G SAS Modular Raid Controller
-- Volumes --
-- ID | Type | Size | Status | InProgress
volume c0u0 | RAID10 2x2 | 1816G | Optimal | None
-- Disks --
-- Encl:Slot | vol-span-unit | Model | Status
disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
End of Output **************************
Let me know if i need to change or configure anything else...
2015 Feb 03
0
Very slow disk I/O
On 2/3/2015 10:00 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/2/2015 8:11 PM, Jatin Davey wrote:
>> disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
>> disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
>> disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
>> disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up
>> End of Output **************************
>>
>> Let me...
2006 Nov 13
4
ANNOUNCE: 0.20.1
The latest release is finally out; here is the changelog:
Mostly a bug-fix release, with the most important fix being the
multiple-definition error.
Completely rewrote the ParsedFile system; each provider is now much
shorter and much more maintainable. However, fundamental problems
were found with the ''port'' type, so it was disabled. Also, added
2012 Sep 12
1
opus-tools resampler
...ile ago (and IIRC they were accepted): http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2009-November/007541.html , http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2009-November/007542.html , http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2009-November/007525.html .
Is there any chance the resampling code could be spun off into a separate library? A commercial-license-friendly resampler would be really helpful (I needed one myself), and a single unified library would make it a lot easier to track updates and patches. I've spun off the resampler parts some time ago when I was working on a project that relied o...
2020 Apr 28
3
CRAN R 4.0.0 for Ubuntu repos missing r-recommend dependency
Hi Dirk,
Thanks for the suggested workarounds. This was just a VM I had spun up so I
could test R4.0.0. I'm happy to wait for Michael to fix it when he has time.
Greg
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 13:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 28 April 2020 at 12:05, Greg Siemon wrote:
> | I noticed that R 4.0.0 is now available...