Andreas Benzler
2016-Apr-15 16:21 UTC
[CentOS] libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??
Hello guys... I compiled inside of "mock" libdrm 2.67 mesa 11.2.1 ati 7.6.1 mockbuild says: libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK installed packaged: xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos @local-drivers OK libdrm.x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK glxinfo says: OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM 3.6.2) OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2 OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00 DRM 2.43.0 ?? Wired...
Andreas Benzler
2016-Apr-15 17:08 UTC
[CentOS] libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??
forgotten to say, on my first centos installation i dig it up as yum-builddep and rpmbuild and it did work: libdrm mesa ati Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:> Hello guys... > > I compiled inside of "mock" > > libdrm 2.67 > mesa 11.2.1 > ati 7.6.1 > > mockbuild says: > > libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK > > mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK > > installed packaged: > > xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos > @local-drivers OK > > libdrm.x86_64 > 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK > > glxinfo says: > > OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM > 3.6.2) > OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2 > OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 > OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 > OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 > OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 > OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES > 3.00 > > DRM 2.43.0 ?? > > Wired... > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Andreas Benzler
2016-Apr-15 17:55 UTC
[CentOS] libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??
after downgrade all mesa libdrm ati: OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 10.6.5 OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 10.6.5 OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 10.6.5 OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00 libdrm info gone...? Output mistake? harmless? Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 19:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:> forgotten to say, > > on my first centos installation i dig it up as > yum-builddep and rpmbuild and it did work: > > libdrm > mesa > ati > > > Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler: > > Hello guys... > > > > I compiled inside of "mock" > > > > libdrm 2.67 > > mesa 11.2.1 > > ati 7.6.1 > > > > mockbuild says: > > > > libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK > > > > mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK > > > > installed packaged: > > > > xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos > > @local-drivers OK > > > > libdrm.x86_64 > > 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK > > > > glxinfo says: > > > > OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM > > 3.6.2) > > OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2 > > OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 > > OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 > > OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 > > OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 > > OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES > > 3.00 > > > > DRM 2.43.0 ?? > > > > Wired... > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Phil Wyett
2016-Apr-16 09:28 UTC
[CentOS] libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler wrote:> Hello guys... > > I compiled inside of "mock" > > libdrm 2.67 > mesa 11.2.1 > ati 7.6.1 > > mockbuild says: > > libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK > > mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK > > installed packaged: > > xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos > @local-drivers OK > > libdrm.x86_64 > 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK > > glxinfo says: > > OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM > 3.6.2) > OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2 > OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 > OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 > OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 > OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 > OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES > 3.00 > > DRM 2.43.0 ?? > > Wired... >These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of these SRPMs? Regards Phil -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160416/a715a651/attachment-0001.sig>
Andreas Benzler
2016-Apr-16 09:56 UTC
[CentOS] libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??
Hello Phil, the idea behind of all my private work to get centos 7 work for more as an server only system: http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/> and it looks like a harmless output that can be ignored. http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/> X11 and ATI (stable) http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/> Mesa (11.1.2 stable) kernel http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/> 4.4.7 lts stable the graphical desktop runs much better. No one of my Desktop PC around works good with the default resources. Don?t forget that centos 7 is from 2014 and two of my machines are from 2010 and 2012. nux-dextop gstreamer never works for me on Centos 7.2 http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/> this setup run everything that i touch in multimedia with totem. Sources and rpm not gpg - private server. Baken with Centos and epel mock Sincerely Andy> Am 16.04.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Phil Wyett <philwyett at irregulars-engineering.com>: > > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> Hello guys... >> >> I compiled inside of "mock" >> >> libdrm 2.67 >> mesa 11.2.1 >> ati 7.6.1 >> >> mockbuild says: >> >> libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK >> >> mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK >> >> installed packaged: >> >> xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos >> @local-drivers OK >> >> libdrm.x86_64 >> 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK >> >> glxinfo says: >> >> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM >> 3.6.2) >> OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2 >> OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 >> OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 >> OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 >> OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 >> OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES >> 3.00 >> >> DRM 2.43.0 ?? >> >> Wired... >> > > These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of > these SRPMs? > > Regards > > Phil