ken
2015-Dec-17 14:23 UTC
[CentOS] [SOLVED... prolly] Re: "installation source" specification for netinstall
On 12/15/2015 09:37 PM, Fred Smith wrote:> This one works: > > http://mirrors.mit.edu/centos/7/os/x86_64/ > > I know because I/ve used it for net installs twice in the last > week or two, most recently a Thursday of last week. > >> >Believe me, I wish it did work. I've been at this stupid >> >specification which should be easy and done over with hours ago. >> >But it doesn't work. > I agreee that it would be nice to have some better doc on how to > choose the URL for a net install, I've stumbled around in the dark > at times past trying to figure it out, too. > > but it definitely DOES work if you get the URL right (and if you have > your networking set up correctly, and the mirror isn't broken, and..., > and..., etc.). > > FredAfter setting up again another the next morning (yesterday), mit didn't work either. The networking was set up alright-- the third time setting up everything for the third time, and, after all, the configuration page confirmed networking. What could be wrong? Well, I went back into the networking config page and saw it was actually all wrong. It didn't for some reason didn't even change the configuration I put in even after clicking on "Done" (several times). Apparently, 'networking connection' to this setup page must have understood to that to mean only TCP/IP level 2 connection to the AP... yes, it could talk to the AP, but not make an actual to the network. At this point I couldn't trust netinstall anymore, wiped it, and yesterday burned and loaded and installed a LiveCD. Days ago, when wrestling with repos setting up, it occurred to me it would be nice for the app to have a small console in it, something which could be used to confirm (by hand) networking was correct and that URLs were there and active... it would be simple. Apparently it's a bad idea for some reason to make any improvements over what comes from upstream. (Sigh.) Thanks, Fred, for the tip. I'll augment your tip: don't believe it when the netinstall configuration says it's (allegedly) correctly configured.
Fred Smith
2015-Dec-17 15:21 UTC
[CentOS] [SOLVED... prolly] Re: "installation source" specification for netinstall
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:23:46AM -0500, ken wrote:> On 12/15/2015 09:37 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >This one works: > > > >http://mirrors.mit.edu/centos/7/os/x86_64/ > > > >I know because I/ve used it for net installs twice in the last > >week or two, most recently a Thursday of last week. > > > >>>Believe me, I wish it did work. I've been at this stupid > >>>specification which should be easy and done over with hours ago. > >>>But it doesn't work. > >I agreee that it would be nice to have some better doc on how to > >choose the URL for a net install, I've stumbled around in the dark > >at times past trying to figure it out, too. > > > >but it definitely DOES work if you get the URL right (and if you have > >your networking set up correctly, and the mirror isn't broken, and..., > >and..., etc.). > > > >Fred > > After setting up again another the next morning (yesterday), mit > didn't work either. The networking was set up alright-- the third > time setting up everything for the third time, and, after all, the > configuration page confirmed networking. What could be wrong? > Well, I went back into the networking config page and saw it was > actually all wrong. It didn't for some reason didn't even change > the configuration I put in even after clicking on "Done" (several > times). Apparently, 'networking connection' to this setup page must > have understood to that to mean only TCP/IP level 2 connection to > the AP... yes, it could talk to the AP, but not make an actual to > the network. At this point I couldn't trust netinstall anymore, > wiped it, and yesterday burned and loaded and installed a LiveCD. > > Days ago, when wrestling with repos setting up, it occurred to me it > would be nice for the app to have a small console in it, something > which could be used to confirm (by hand) networking was correct and > that URLs were there and active... it would be simple. Apparently > it's a bad idea for some reason to make any improvements over what > comes from upstream. (Sigh.) > > Thanks, Fred, for the tip. I'll augment your tip: don't believe it > when the netinstall configuration says it's (allegedly) correctly > configured.During installation CTRL-ALT-F2, I believe, wikll give you a console at which you can verify the networking configuration. To be honest, I can never remember which of the screens accessible by ctrl-alt-fX is the right one, but I think it's f2, and its not hard to tell by trying f2, f3, etc. -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." ---------------------------- Hebrews 4:12 (niv) ------------------------------
ken
2015-Dec-17 17:59 UTC
[CentOS] [SOLVED... prolly] Re: "installation source" specification for netinstall
On 12/17/2015 10:21 AM, Fred Smith wrote:> During installation CTRL-ALT-F2, I believe, wikll give you a console > at which you can verify the networking configuration. To be honest, > I can never remember which of the screens accessible by ctrl-alt-fX is > the right one, but I think it's f2, and its not hard to tell by > trying f2, f3, etc.Okay, so that's why I saw that chick with all that text tattooed on her thigh. Hmmm. Seriously, that would be a good little piece of documentation they could put on the GUI... also how to return from the console back to the GUI. Too late, but thanks for the info anyway.