2015-11-12 15:56 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de>:> On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as >> follows: >> >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own >> address as source address >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own >> address as source address >> > > sounds like a loop. > > What says 'brctl show'? >When I enable stp: [root at localhost ~]# brctl show br0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 enp0s8> > best regards > Ulf > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:> When I enable stp: > > [root at localhost ~]# brctl show br0 > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 > enp0s8As Gordon said, i recommend to remove one of the physical interfaces from the bridge. best regards Ulf
2015-11-13 12:32 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de>:> On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > When I enable stp: >> >> [root at localhost ~]# brctl show br0 >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 >> enp0s8 >> > > As Gordon said, i recommend to remove one of the physical interfaces from > the bridge. > > > best regards > Ulf > _______________________________________________ >I've found that setting virtual interfaces as NAT instead bridge, it works, any ideas? (Remember that it's a guest OS) Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Ulf Volmer wrote:>On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:>>When I enable stp: >> >> [root at localhost ~]# brctl show br0 >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 >> enp0s8 > >As Gordon said, i recommend to remove one of the physical interfaces from the >bridge.There should be no need to do that ... that is after all the purpose of STP (in effect, what STP would do is prevent one link from being used by putting it into blocking state leaving the other in forwarding state). Nominally one would prefer bonding (AKA trunking or a LAG) where both can be actively used. /mark