On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 17:42 -0500, Hal Wigoda wrote:> I'm old school. > If it works........ don't ******* change it ? C7 appears to be a nightmare. So many problems. I do not remember as many problems with the introduction of C6. I like lasting stability. Same commands. Same reliability. No need to waste time learning new tricks when many of the existing old tricks remain undiscovered. Anyone might think RH is attempting to emulate Windoze. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. No problems with C5 and with C6.
On 5/10/2015 5:03 PM, Always Learning wrote:> C7 appears to be a nightmare. So many problems. I do not remember as > many problems with the introduction of C6.so far, other than having to learn a couple new commands, C7 really hasn't been a problem for us, everything we need to run works just fine. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 06:00:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:> so far, other than having to learn a couple new commands, C7 really > hasn't been a problem for us, everything we need to run works just > fine.Once I decided to stop complaining about C7, it wasn't bad to learn about the different stuff. Complaining about it is mostly a waste of time. -- g