<rant> So, we've got a couple of WinDoze servers, and we getting logs from them. Except the logs seem to stop on occasion. My manager set me onto this (I *loathe* WinDoze, but someone's gotta do it), and I finally found out that a previous co-worker installed eventlog-to-syslog, which seems to be hosted in google code. And it *seems* to have come from Purdue Univ. So < found the readme, and wanted to cut down the verbosity. There's a startup flag for this. The log levels are: 1: critical 2: error 3: warning 4: info 0: everything/verbosity The start flag that you can give it is the "minimum" log level. And no, I did *not* write those levels out of order. Can *anyone* explain to me in what number system 0 is *not* less than 3?.... </rant> mark
On Wed, May 6, 2015 3:26 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:> <rant> > So, we've got a couple of WinDoze servers, and we getting logs from them. > Except the logs seem to stop on occasion. My manager set me onto this (I > *loathe* WinDoze, but someone's gotta do it), and I finally found out that > a previous co-worker installed eventlog-to-syslog, which seems to be > hosted in google code. And it *seems* to have come from Purdue Univ. > > So < found the readme, and wanted to cut down the verbosity. There's a > startup flag for this. > The log levels are: > 1: critical > 2: error > 3: warning > 4: info > 0: everything/verbosity > > The start flag that you can give it is the "minimum" log level. And no, I > did *not* write those levels out of order. Can *anyone* explain to me in > what number system 0 is *not* less than 3?.... > </rant> >That's a good one, Mark! You made my day. Didn't you know that Windows programmers the only ones who count 1,2,3,4,5,... [all normal programmers count 0,1,2,3,4,5,... AFAIK]. I wonder how at all they got "0" in their levels ;-) Valeri> mark++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> On May 6, 2015, at 15:17, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > That's a good one, Mark! You made my day. Didn't you know that Windows > programmers the only ones who count 1,2,3,4,5,... [all normal programmers > count 0,1,2,3,4,5,... AFAIK]. I wonder how at all they got "0" in their > levels ;-)Integer overflow ...
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [OT] eventlog-to-syslog
- [ win32utils-Bugs-28904 ] Gem win32-eventlog v0.5.2 on Ruby 1.9.1 and 1.9.2
- seg on windows-pr-0.5.1 (was RE: win32-eventlog 0.4.0)
- Syslogging and remote installer (was RE: seg on windows-pr-0.5.1 (was RE: win32-eventlog 0.4.0))
- RE: Another Interesting "Problem" with Win32-EventLog