On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:> Johnny, > > Should we give up hope on this issue? >After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works.> > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < >> leonfauster at googlemail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" < >> mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>>>> : >>>>> Any new information here? >>>> >>>> maybe some cooperation with the fedora community >>>> would help to share the effort. >>>> >>>> Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo >>>> >>>> >>> Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and >> libs. >> >> >> as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the >> organizational layer and less on the technical one.-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150316/a9329b01/attachment-0001.sig>
On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> Johnny, >> >> Should we give up hope on this issue? >> > > After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I > am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. > But, I personally would try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, > as the one directly from google currently works.ARGH .. autocorrect ... s/work/would -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150316/d4ef7253/attachment-0001.sig>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:> On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> Johnny, >> >> Should we give up hope on this issue? >> > > After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I > am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. > But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, > as the one directly from google currently works. >What is it that is actually missing in CentOS6? Would it be stuff that is already available in the devtoolset SCL's - or would build under that? If that would work, why fight with other ways of doing it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Chromium fans might want to check this also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9164251 Apparently there will be problems on kernels not supporting TSYNC (not sure how to check for this). -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message -----> From: "Les Mikesell" <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Monday, 16 March, 2015 15:19:29 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> Johnny, >>> >>> Should we give up hope on this issue? >>> >> >> After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I >> am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. >> But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, >> as the one directly from google currently works. >> > > What is it that is actually missing in CentOS6? Would it be stuff > that is already available in the devtoolset SCL's - or would build > under that? If that would work, why fight with other ways of doing > it? > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikesell at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos