search for: pita

...3 LC 2 Makaira nigricans 20 VU 3 Makaira nigricans 20 VU 4. Makaira nigricans 20 VU 5 Sarda sarda 2 LC 4 Lethrinus lentjan 12 LC 5 Raja pita 8 DD 6 Raja pita 2 DD I need: Species Values Code 1 Acanthocybium solandri 33 LC 2 Makaira nigricans 60 VU 3 Sarda sarda 2 LC 4 Lethrinus lentjan...

...me to lunch.. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven > Schwedas via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 11:44 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and this > needs to improve > > Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once > again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten > different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to > be...

On 21/05/2019 10:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once > again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten > different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to > be lower priority than malloc debug info". Once again, none of these > messages

On 21/05/2019 13:29, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > On 21.05.19 14:16, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> You need to > investigate your DB problems > > Great, but how? > >> I see no reason to have different smb.conf files for different Unix >> domain members, just don't have 'netbios name' in any smb.conf. > There's also share definitions in the

Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once > again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten > different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to > be lower priority than malloc debug info". Once again, none of these

On 21/05/2019 12:27, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > The smb.conf hasn't changed since the last three or four times I've > posted here asking for help: > > https://up.tao.at/u/samba/villach-file.txt > > Top level error I'm seeing is that since today *some* Windows users are > denied SMB access to this one member server ("Network password is >

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven > Schwedas via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 15:04 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and > this needs to improve > > On 21.05.19 14:37, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > winbind enum users = yes > > winbind enum groups = yes > > Better no, works the same, but your server is faster. > > Since Cyrus IMAPD cannot query LDAP for group membership...

Sven, Fist fix the smb.conf as i suggested, cap and non caps where it should be. Resolving settings based on the script output looks ok. Fix krb5.conf Then how many DC's are you having? > So, could somebody maybe help with the NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION > / DRS replication issue? Or will it be easier to just demote > the DC and provision a new one? Are all DC's

My synapses are rather fried after a long few days of debugging other problems, so perhaps I'm being lazy in sending this to the general list, but I can't think straight about it. Forgive me if there is an overly obvious solution to this. I have a list of phone numbers that are SIP extensions. I'd like to dial them via SIP if ${EXTEN} is equal to one of those numbers. If

This seems exceptionally evil and is definitely a PITA. What was the original problem that led us to do this? I''d like to take a stab at correcting it so we can have a more sane installation. Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensour...

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven > Schwedas via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 16:44 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and > this needs to improve > > On 21.05.19 16:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > >> Since Cyrus IMAPD cannot query LDAP for group memberships, we > >> need this to make shared folders work with groups on our > mail servers. > >> Useless on this mach...

On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Johnny, > > Should we give up hope on this issue? > After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works. > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian...

...TAG-in-1](DTAG-in-template) host=217.0.16.103 ... [DTAG-in-30](DTAG-in-template) host=217.0.20.99 I've done that to improve security and to be able to assign all calls coming in via Deutsche Telekom to a dedicated dialplan context. Unfortunately this approach is not scalable and it's a PITA to maintain a list of server IP addresses since Deutsche Telekom will get more SIP servers in the future. They've started to migrate the classic POTS/ISDN network to VoIP, the goal is get it done by 2016. Customers with DSL get VoIP directly, i.e. they need SIP phones or a SIP PBX, and cust...

The smb.conf hasn't changed since the last three or four times I've posted here asking for help: https://up.tao.at/u/samba/villach-file.txt Top level error I'm seeing is that since today *some* Windows users are denied SMB access to this one member server ("Network password is invalid"), but not all users. Worked fine before today. wbinfo -p/-P work, wbinfo -a shows the

...OS person. I cut my teeth on command line DOS and then WIN 3.xx (these days that means WFWG 3.11). I drew the line at WIN9x. Hate that beast with a true passion, but because it is the 800 pound gorilla, I have to find some way to accomodate it in the future. So, here is the rub. Linux is a real PITA. Capital PITA. Unbelievably techie and that is bad. I say that because I was a techie in the DOS years. People came to me to do this or that thing that they couldn't do because they were not computer nerds. Like me. I'm no longer interested in being the nerd of the moment. Youse guys ha...

...the DNIS will be seen as an extension, but I'm seeing each digit of the DNIS as a separate extension. So in my case I send DNIS of 12345, Asterisk will jump from extension 1 to extension 2 to extension 3 to extension 4 to extension 5. Only executing the first one or two lines in each. This is a PITA! And make absolutely no sense to me. Thanks, David Ruggles CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+ Network Engineer Safe Data, Inc. (910) 285-7200 david@safedatausa.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization issues (mostly on lab situations). Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur&quo...

On 21.05.19 14:16, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> You need to investigate your DB problems Great, but how? > I see no reason to have different smb.conf files for different Unix > domain members, just don't have 'netbios name' in any smb.conf. There's also share definitions in the files which I omitted, which are the actual meat of the config files. > You will also

Can anyone point me at a good doc on farting about with the registry? Or do you feel like giving me the fool's guide? I have large tracts of registry entries to stuff in, and adding them via Edit/new in regedit is an absolute PITA and unworkably slow. I have files from exported from a win98 registry (via windoze regedit) with the correct info. I need to add because programs are not finding installed packages. TIA, -- Declan Moriarty <junk_mail@iol.ie>

...'m using version 1.4.1, rpms kindly provided by Karan on his repository. My main concern is data loss, not security itself. From what I noticed, the strenght of CFS crypto is less than optimal. CFS right now looks like a very convenient solution. Much easier than the losetup stuff (which is a PITA). TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFwrkBpdyWzQ5b5ckRAsl1AKCbqS1vKK3d8zFq42n7GNJlb5cQkACeJXq0 rhMkV+...