On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:37:42PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: Noise removed. Quick question, if I may? What does this have to do with CentOS? John -- Spring is nature's way of saying, "Let's party!" -- Robin Williams (1952-), American actor and comedian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150106/b30a6c1d/attachment-0001.sig>
On Jan 6, 2015, at 6:49 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote:> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:37:42PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > > Noise removed. > > Quick question, if I may? What does this have to do with CentOS?Some people are annoyed that CentOS keeps changing on them, and keep going to greater and greater lengths to try and argue that CentOS should not change. I am explaining to them why this is not a productive view.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:> On Jan 6, 2015, at 6:49 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:37:42PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Noise removed. >> >> Quick question, if I may? What does this have to do with CentOS? > > Some people are annoyed that CentOS keeps changing on them, and keep going to greater and greater lengths to try and argue that CentOS should not change.No one has said it should not change. Just that it breaks all users existing work when it changes in non-backwards compatible ways.> I am explaining to them why this is not a productive view.The non-productive part is that every user who has ever built anything of non-stable components has to deal with the problem on an individual basis. Is there any centralized approach to converting something that worked on CentOS6 to run on CentOS7? Does the program that is supposed to try to automatically upgrade versions have any tricks hidden away to fix things so they work after the upgrade, and could any of them be run separately? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:52:48PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:> > Some people are annoyed that CentOS keeps changing on them, and keep going to greater and greater lengths to try and argue that CentOS should not change. > > I am explaining to them why this is not a productive view.It's not relevant in _any_ sense. CentOS is nothing more than (at it's core) a rebuild of RHEL. This type of nonsense should be directed to Red Hat in a Red Hat venue. It's nothing but off-topic noise here as CentOS will not deviate from its upstream in its core offerings. John -- Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give offense. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy. http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150106/212557e9/attachment-0001.sig>