The suggestion from Marco to try a non-3D DE worked. I tried two methods:
1. minimal Centos 7 install and xfce install via CLI. Worked fine.
2. Gnome Centos 7 install and then xfce install via yum groupinstall.
Worked fine.
One tip for anyone doing this:
After starting vncserver the first time, it creates a ~/.vnc/xstartup
file. This will be the same type of session if you logged in locally.
Edit that file so that it contains the following:
#!/bin/sh
exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc
Then it will start up an xfce session.
A method to debug this is to actually launch the session on the host by
running the xstartup file. If it works on the host it will most likely
will work on the remote client. If you try this without the xstartup
file mod above it will fail with the 'oh no ...' error right there in a
new window on the host. It helps avoid some running around.
Many thanks for the help on this. A nice side effect is that I am
spending effort to install xfce on all my VMs. The performance
improvement is dramatic. And mostly gone is that arduous Gnome3 DE. I
really tried to use it. It's kind of OK for light work, but for any
medium multi-tasking it is frustrating.
Stan
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:53:21 -0700
From: Stan Cruise<stancruise at me.com>
To:centos at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Centos 7 Nvidia openGL breaks vncserver
Message-ID:<546C3051.4040503 at me.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:46 pm MT -0700
Stan Cruise <stancruise at
me.com<http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote:
Thanks Marco.
Gnome3 it is. I naively figured that this was the 'default' but alas it
is a selection which I did make.
I had seen hints of this in discussions elsewhere and did try KDE, but
that is tough sledding on C7, and I got impatient. I should have stuck
it out. (KDE has a bug on vncserver enable and creates the wrong symlink
in /etc. At least it is different and requires work to get it right).
Mate is my next try.
I did try the nvidia-detect and it did say to use 340.58.
Thanks again for helping me converge. I will be silent for a bit to try
out different DEs.
Stan
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:32:36 -0700
Stan Cruise <stancruise at
me.com<http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote:
> / Bare metal Centos 6.5, vncserver running, client able to connect with
/>/ perfect resolution. Nvidia GT240, driver 331.49.
/>/
/>/ Upgrade to Centos 7 with nouveau basic driver, all still works fine.
/>/ Resolution poor on wire connected monitor, but perfect on vnc client
/>/ session (1920x1080).
/>/
/>/ Upgrade Nvidia driver via elrepo. 340.58; removed nouveau via
/>/ 'Software' manager. Excellent wired monitor resolution.
/>/
/>/ But >> Client vnc connect receives the dreaded 'oh no,
something
/>/ has .....'
/
Are you maybe trying to run Gnome3 through vnc by any chance? Because
Gnome3 requires 3D acceleration, and I'm not sure that nvidia driver
would simulate 3D stuff in software (nouveau should fall back to mesa
in case hardware acceleration fails --- typical of a vnc session).
So my suggestion is to try KDE or XFCE or LXDE or Mate or... any other
DE which doesn't require 3D features to work. Such DE should work
through vnc using nvidia driver no problem --- the only exception is
Gnome3.
> / Backed out Nvidia 340.58, back to nouveau, client vnc works again.
/>/ Also tried 304 driver (only other one in elrepo for el7) - same
/>/ problem.
/
You don't want to guess which driver you need. Use the nvidia-detect
utility from elrepo, it will tell you which driver to install.
> / Research seems to indicate that openGL does not play well with vnc. I
/>/ cannot see any solutions posted as yet.
/>/
/>/ So, what are my options?
/
My choice would be to try a less demanding DE first.
> / Maybe change out the video card for AMD? I cannot know if the
/>/ Catalyst driver will work, but there is a much more active and
/>/ extensive open driver community, which could work better than nouveau?
/
Catalyst driver has always been a pure gamble for me (i.e. worked 50%
of time, supported 50% of video cards, and could be installed on 50%
distributions... or so...). The open-source radeon driver is much better
supported.
That said, the radeon community is not any more active or more extensive
than the nouveau community. It's just that AMD has released the specs
for their cards, so they have a much easier job of maintaining the
radeon driver than the nouveau community (which basically needs to RE
everything from scratch).
HTH,
Marko
