David Docherty
2014-Nov-20 14:29 UTC
[CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 - Email found in subject
Received
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:00 AM
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 - Email found in subject
Send CentOS mailing list submissions to
centos at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-owner at centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CentOS digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10
(centos-announce-request at centos.org)
2. NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS
does (wwp)
3. Re: NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS
does (John R. Dennison)
4. Re: NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS
does (wwp)
5. Re: Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated (Ned Slider)
6. New mailserver problems (Robert Moskowitz)
7. Re: Actual complaining: nixspam (G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator)
8. Re: New mailserver problems (Jason Pyeron)
9. Re: Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated (milos.blazevic)
10. Re: Actual complaining: nixspam (G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator)
11. Re: New mailserver problems (Les Mikesell)
12. Re: New mailserver problems (Robert Moskowitz)
13. Re: New mailserver problems (Les Mikesell)
14. Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ian Pilcher)
15. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Frank Cox)
16. CentOS 7 not installable using KVM-over-IP System
(Dennis Jacobfeuerborn)
17. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ian Pilcher)
18. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ned Slider)
19. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ian Pilcher)
20. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Mark LaPierre)
21. Please remove mirrors.skyshe.cn from mirror list,Thanks! (Tom)
22. Re: exercising pam_cracklib from the command line (Elias Persson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:00:02 +0000
From: centos-announce-request at centos.org
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10
Message-ID: <mailman.5.1416398402.2599.centos-announce at centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2014:1868 CentOS 5 device-mapper BugFix Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CEBA-2014:1867 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CEEA-2014:1869 CentOS 6 oracleasm Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
6. CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 6 libXfont Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
7. CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 7 libXfont Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
8. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:05:22 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement
Update
Message-ID: <20141118140522.GA17324 at chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the
mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
13adbf882bc3119c5a28da78246e6cdc76244d871aa22cbe8e123cf011573768
tzdata-2014j-1.el5.i386.rpm
d4c91d72a5e00be8e57982a675dec72ae9c42bcc8b425e265704c84cd97220b3
tzdata-java-2014j-1.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
89c23f9bbba8e12764ba6f99cd3914d4ded95ea0e913034aa87176d7d3f75db0
tzdata-2014j-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
ddfaec7c260ada435204baea8ea8839c3549888ec25d53067c933c2eb3bc0d38
tzdata-java-2014j-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
2fc45d4a04df98f734de68ce682d407deb472f02ca79099f57a91847b396043d
tzdata-2014j-1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:06:20 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1868 CentOS 5 device-mapper
BugFix Update
Message-ID: <20141118140620.GA17425 at chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1868
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1868.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
4cb33df1c0ef17015e9bb009c956cd9f9a535036b4183878015d8150a271a6b9
device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm
386754cd706bebd48282d305000984e6476f40cbba6da3ffe531426666eefad6
device-mapper-event-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm
x86_64:
4cb33df1c0ef17015e9bb009c956cd9f9a535036b4183878015d8150a271a6b9
device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm
3bc114d4788ea74db77c602fbba97626b17ac4ff3c3e8df8cc8377a591e67bb1
device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.x86_64.rpm
6a1b527e304b8e2f4798cca3ca5c382041a407a33d3bb8b986daeae928f612d1
device-mapper-event-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fa705696164cbf5c7dc693e8d5a8668202568b146ff7ba61ab108346111d23f7
device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:08 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1867 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix
Update
Message-ID: <20141118141708.GA20085 at n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1867
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1867.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
305b71ff15dc5ba36ace6b4d1606f0275714f81f29fe814b680d6fae9dbba2fa
nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
40cf10d2757b150e8802e29492f0514edf27da85955faaf3111dd226a82ad3a2
nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
5926791994ab63650cc72109865685e778bdd4c172b23e19700cd9565a62b9c4
nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
339ca1e102362ff6c50dd784a2d782fcf9a99a0534081a68920bec478f88316f
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
305b71ff15dc5ba36ace6b4d1606f0275714f81f29fe814b680d6fae9dbba2fa
nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
0d21406fb8860e671ddae976edefe82c8033a49e1a071df39359f7b042a99f50
nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
40cf10d2757b150e8802e29492f0514edf27da85955faaf3111dd226a82ad3a2
nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
d0edcc698681d44e636093ffa108760867e9755713c467370bc5f489684388f7
nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
5926791994ab63650cc72109865685e778bdd4c172b23e19700cd9565a62b9c4
nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
872ea19cefdbab59fbf10ba536055ab8544ab2c07501169280006874d5bd476a
nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
339ca1e102362ff6c50dd784a2d782fcf9a99a0534081a68920bec478f88316f
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm
eef496abfe4a8d8a44ff47f95ffab070e1ca92200c15e37622f9e08724aea272
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
41ca911eef52dddb0ba8fbc9fbd847cc2ed3f7aba6f2b7e408427e320996d7ba
nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:42 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement
Update
Message-ID: <20141118141742.GA20299 at n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
3e20e95f57fa81a1d0781678b01df6847d77f24c9c6c807a37a07c678f269429
tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm
529782b8a983414bc21bd5e8cec0add022d8cbb933ebb54753afe5b2e11ea837
tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
3e20e95f57fa81a1d0781678b01df6847d77f24c9c6c807a37a07c678f269429
tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm
529782b8a983414bc21bd5e8cec0add022d8cbb933ebb54753afe5b2e11ea837
tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm
Source:
01050fef89d203565fee4ed6e0dea67db203df100aac4a6aa77356cea3607790
tzdata-2014j-1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:18:10 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1869 CentOS 6 oracleasm
Enhancement Update
Message-ID: <20141118141810.GA20456 at n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1869
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1869.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
8e529bd839efa213af7a9d23677fe18f22a0ed2a64234bb48f5eaeae0fbf23d9
kmod-oracleasm-2.0.8-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f985532fa70023e18280e2ba3ef627e9967652599f9da437c45de1014a134e7e
oracleasm-2.0.8-4.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:18:34 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 6 libXfont
Security Update
Message-ID: <20141118141834.GA20687 at n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1870 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1870.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
13834a3e7436e041b8455eb295055e10d6eb636d0b63ca52ca923505a46b95ac
libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
17a24810e40317805a3f1d2b4cfb0a320c82dc5a65ce092f7e0c03e8c2a95e1a
libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
13834a3e7436e041b8455eb295055e10d6eb636d0b63ca52ca923505a46b95ac
libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
fd0ab920b5579b750bf2bd6cf3314a1c967714e80182d169d6fb41bdb363a89a
libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
17a24810e40317805a3f1d2b4cfb0a320c82dc5a65ce092f7e0c03e8c2a95e1a
libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
669eff421714a4f4eec43261923dbe7fb224dc0c96c5407c63bf16404cce2bbc
libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0389c2ba2eb96e97f7c26798356dfbaec9e09aaf9106ab4599e194eadd2182de
libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:33:30 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 7 libXfont
Security Update
Message-ID: <20141118183330.GA37348 at n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1870 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1870.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
4db16b52f6e2005a48f611e2634fe0be85344f8fd63c8df546ac5aa805a146aa
libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.i686.rpm
2bea9726aa656252acb5c4bd08b2f8c69faa67e64e138a6eca61d6370876a0ab
libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
0fd4d95b96ba54cf9f7a7313c38ece120f83451b169e69c83fd151ffa73ac315
libXfont-devel-1.4.7-2.el7_0.i686.rpm
90931cc19fe4bd908b2ea8265eec983c068743a0ffd2d6982387b1e7122ebac9
libXfont-devel-1.4.7-2.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b96aa205cc865dd7a15ef79606271bf02f57a45be111f9c888ce2169497b9c97
libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:37:19 +0000
From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement
Update
Message-ID: <20141118183719.GA37518 at n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
3c2392072374f63df6dcc1fa55adcfc99611803fdf51d55f2946fafa2fe1c1d6
tzdata-2014j-1.el7_0.noarch.rpm
4a54a7598e8390f93212bddcbf918c24c4d37640c841ef96383e01327c5647dc
tzdata-java-2014j-1.el7_0.noarch.rpm
Source:
52a2463bc19c552d1eee2bdc4d4f0afa93a648406704a1ef951ed1759b385723
tzdata-2014j-1.el7_0.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10
************************************************
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:07:50 +0100
From: wwp <subscript at free.fr>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from
PUIAS does
Message-ID: <20141119130750.48f59145 at anthra>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello there,
here on my CentOS 6 (up-to-date), since a recent update of the NTFS
modules to ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-6 from EPEL repo, mounting my NTFS
partitions simply doesn't work ("NTFS signature is missing").
Back to puias' 2011.4.12-5.puias6 and it works again. Such issue
observed on several CentOS systems, while upgrading to 6.6.
Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found
nothing yet.
Regards,
--
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141119/cbc0fa86/attachment-0001.sig>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:09:35 -0600
From: "John R. Dennison" <jrd at gerdesas.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one
from PUIAS does
Message-ID: <20141119120935.GG777 at frodo.gerdesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:07:50PM +0100, wwp wrote:>
> Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found
> nothing yet.
Perhaps open a ticket in bugzilla against EPEL for that component if one
doesn't already exist?
John
--
Be in charge of your own destiny, or some one else will.
-- John Francis "Jack" Welch, Jr. (1935-), past Chairman
and CEO of General Electric
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141119/a55579f8/attachment-0001.sig>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:25:10 +0100
From: wwp <subscript at free.fr>
To: "John R. Dennison" <jrd at gerdesas.com>
Cc: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one
from PUIAS does
Message-ID: <20141119132510.78a22f76 at anthra>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello John,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:09:35 -0600 "John R. Dennison" <jrd at
gerdesas.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:07:50PM +0100, wwp wrote:
> >
> > Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but
found
> > nothing yet.
>
> Perhaps open a ticket in bugzilla against EPEL for that component if one
> doesn't already exist?
Found it! I'll have to wait for next package update, I guess
(ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-7.el6 to come).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164757
Regards,
--
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141119/7fbe4073/attachment-0001.sig>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:29:31 +0000
From: Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk>
To: centos at centos.org
Cc: Mail list for wiki articles <centos-docs at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated
Message-ID: <546C8D2B.2000007 at unixmail.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 19/11/14 11:17, Milos Blazevic wrote:> Hi all,
>
>
> Long time, no speak. Shifting from private sector job to full-time
> freelance work took its toll.
> As a result, among other things, the Broadcom Wiki page
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom I
"maintain" was
> neglected, and over the past couple of years I've been receiving e-mail
> inquiries about the Wiki and its applicability.
>
> I'm happy to say and let you all know that the Wiki page has been
> updated with instructions for compiling the latest Broadcom driver
> with the latest kernel release, and the driver was tested. The current
> instructions are applicable to CentOS 6 x86_64, but I'm hoping to
expand
> that to CentOS 7 as well.
> CentOS 5 instructions were removed. Of course, I can post compilation
> instructions for 5 also, but it'd be tested on a VM and the driver
> module wouldn't actually go through proper testing. Your thoughts on
> this matter are certainly welcome.
>
> The page is still being reviewed/edited by myself and could use
> 'polishing', but again, your feedback is always more than welcome
and
> even desired!
>
>
Hi Milos,
Always great to see folks contributing, so thanks for your efforts!
Regarding Step 4a: Loading the driver module into kernel:
modprobe understands module dependencies and will automatically resolve
them whereas insmod does not. Therefore one should probably use modprobe
to load the module.
You mix the usage of insmod and modprobe in section 4a - for consistency
I would stick to modprobe at which point the discussion about manually
loading module dependencies becomes irrelevant and could be removed to
simplify the section.
I've also copied my reply to the centos-docs list.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:36:08 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: [CentOS] New mailserver problems
Message-ID: <546C9CC8.20509 at htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Well, in part we will see if you get this and I get the return.
I JUST launched my new mail server after a few miscues. Actually the OS
is Redsleeve6, which is the arm port of Centos 6, and perhaps some of my
problems may come down to porting problems. But first, it may be that
despite my testing, I missed something in the configurations.
First clamd problems:
Nov 19 08:09:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
Nov 19 08:10:15 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts
Nov 19 08:11:13 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
Nov 19 08:11:35 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts
Nov 19 08:12:33 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
Nov 19 08:12:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts
Nov 19 08:14:07 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
Then amavis problems:
08:08:42 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) Checking: dkz-30wwFhmC
[85.214.87.163] <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> -> <rgm at
htt-consult.com>
Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)run_av (ClamAV-clamd)
FAILED - unexpected ,
output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n"
Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)ClamAV-clamd
av-scanner FAILED: CODE(0x29d9e28) unexpected ,
output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" at (eval 100) line 594.
Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!!)WARN: all primary
virus scanners failed, considering backups
But is seems others are working?
Anyway, a mailserver change is always painful....
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:14:57 +0100
From: G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Actual complaining: nixspam
Message-ID: <546CA5E1.6030304 at filmakademie.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison:> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident.
>
> There is a legal term that applies to this use case: "extortion"
AFAIK IX is not billing .... They do a great job for couple of years.
The problem might be m.roths provider, if they have a zombi spam system
somewhere and dynamic IPs e.g. they can be put on the list.
http://www.heise.de/ix/NiX-Spam-DNSBL-and-blacklist-for-download-499637.html
If your mail server is affected by our blacklist please ask your
internet service provider or your network administrator to shut down the
spam source in your network because this is the blacklisting reason.
Follow the removal instructions on www.dnsbl.manitu.net if you need to
speed up the delisting process.
my2cents /G?tz
--
G?tz Reinicke
IT-Koordinator
Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420
E-Mail goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
Filmakademie Baden-W?rttemberg GmbH
Akademiehof 10
71638 Ludwigsburg
www.filmakademie.de
Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: J?rgen Walter MdL
Staatssekret?r im Ministerium f?r Wissenschaft,
Forschung und Kunst Baden-W?rttemberg
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Prof. Thomas Schadt
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:57:29 -0500
From: "Jason Pyeron" <jpyeron at pdinc.us>
To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems
Message-ID: <6AF6C4418ACA408A96818C7C28A337F8 at black>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Moskowitz
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:36
>
> Well, in part we will see if you get this and I get the return.
>
> I JUST launched my new mail server after a few miscues.
> Actually the OS
> is Redsleeve6, which is the arm port of Centos 6, and perhaps
Can you reproduce in a VM on normal Centos 6 with the same config files and
package names (and versions)?
> some of my
> problems may come down to porting problems. But first, it
> may be that
> despite my testing, I missed something in the configurations.
>
> First clamd problems:
>
> Nov 19 08:09:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
> Nov 19 08:10:15 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts
> Nov 19 08:11:13 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
> Nov 19 08:11:35 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts
> Nov 19 08:12:33 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
> Nov 19 08:12:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts
> Nov 19 08:14:07 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on:
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts
>
> Then amavis problems:
>
> 08:08:42 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) Checking: dkz-30wwFhmC
> [85.214.87.163] <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> ->
> <rgm at htt-consult.com>
> Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)run_av
> (ClamAV-clamd)
> FAILED - unexpected ,
> output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
> lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n"
> Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)ClamAV-clamd
> av-scanner FAILED: CODE(0x29d9e28) unexpected ,
> output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
> lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" at (eval 100) line 594.
> Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!!)WARN: all primary
> virus scanners failed, considering backups
>
> But is seems others are working?
>
> Anyway, a mailserver change is always painful....
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:00:56 +0000
From: "milos.blazevic" <milos.blazevic at sbb.rs>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Cc: Mail list for wiki articles <centos-docs at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated
Message-ID:
<20141119150056.Horde._vgIUo-rFTXA33JWsPLUUw1 at webmail2.sbb.rs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
Quoting Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk>:>
> Hi Milos,
>
> Always great to see folks contributing, so thanks for your efforts!
>
> Regarding Step 4a: Loading the driver module into kernel:
>
> modprobe understands module dependencies and will automatically resolve
> them whereas insmod does not. Therefore one should probably use modprobe
> to load the module.
>
> You mix the usage of insmod and modprobe in section 4a - for consistency
> I would stick to modprobe at which point the discussion about manually
> loading module dependencies becomes irrelevant and could be removed to
> simplify the section.
>
> I've also copied my reply to the centos-docs list.
>
Hello Ned,
I appreciate your prompt response, and definitely agree with you
regarding the insmod part. I was actually thinking of removing that
completely from the Wiki and leaving only the modprobe part of the 4a
section. In addition, it appears to cause confusion to user who are
not very tech/Linux savvy. The only reason why I left it there is
because at the time of the original document writing, there were some
issues where 'insmod' proved useful.
In addition, I just noticed that the boot-time module loading part is
obsolete by being applicable to CentOS 5, rather than 6. I'll move on
and update that also.
Cheers,
Milos.
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:23:13 +0100
From: G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Actual complaining: nixspam
Message-ID: <546CB5E1.4010900 at filmakademie.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am 19.11.14 um 15:31 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us:> G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
>> Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison:
>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major
incident.
>>>
>>> There is a legal term that applies to this use case:
"extortion"
>>
>> AFAIK IX is not billing .... They do a great job for couple of years.
>
> They have NOT been doing a "great job" for many years. Back
around 2000 or
> 2001, Cogeco in Canada was using them... and they blocked Chicago
> Roadrunner, which was *the* ISP for most of the city of Chicago, one of
> the three largest cities in the US (competition? what's that?) Right
now,
> hostmonster, my hosting provider, uses a primary mailserver to send from
> their literal millions of domains (I got that figure from their tech
> support), and it was hostmonster's tech support that told me they were
> paying something like $150 "per incident" to get themselves
removed - I
> assume this is when nixspam claims they've got too many complaints for
me
> to remove myself. In ANY large hosting provider, anyone can buy a domain
> and start spamming in hours, if not minutes, and I challenge you to show
> me a large hosting provider that does not have this problem.
>
So some tech support tells you something, and you believe him for 100%?
Go and get some real prove.
> Twenty years ago, when there were thousands of small ISPs, nixspam's
> method made sense. With the mergers, and the near-death of small ISPs,
> it's an *idiot's* idea. Plus, they don't offer a whitelist, to
get one's
> self listed, for love or money.
If it is such and idiot's idea, why are they still so famous and widely
used?
>
> No, they're assholes, using a methodology that's 15+ years out of
date.
> And, I'll note, even the CentOS list gets spam, in spite of nixspam.
Uh. your rudeness gives an deep insight of your state of mind and your
POV. masterstroke to be taken seriously!
>>
>> The problem might be m.roths provider, if they have a zombi spam system
>> somewhere and dynamic IPs e.g. they can be put on the list.
>
> See above. Perhaps you don't understand the current business model of
> large hosting providers, and the reality of what they have to deal with.
I know that and a lot of them (still) suck. We hat all over Germany
problems couple of years ago with phone companies like eplus and cable
tv providers as ISPs getting an RBLs etc. Still web.de, 1&1 and gmx with
++45 millions of mail accounts suck in some ways (currently we are
investigating such an issue.)
>>
>>
http://www.heise.de/ix/NiX-Spam-DNSBL-and-blacklist-for-download-499637.html
>>
>> If your mail server is affected by our blacklist please ask your
>> internet service provider or your network administrator to shut down
the
>> spam source in your network because this is the blacklisting reason.
>> Follow the removal instructions on www.dnsbl.manitu.net if you need to
>> speed up the delisting process.
>
> Wait, *YOUR* blacklist? Are you actually affiliated with nixspam? If so,
> then add a significant number of curses and insults, because you have *NO*
> answer to what I say, above. And, btw, when are you going to block, say,
> yahoo's mailservers?
//very confused head-shaking//
Read all information provided, than start shouting ... if you where
interested in a objective discussion and problem solving you would have
opened the link and read the text and would have seen that this is a
quote. sorry that I forgot to mark and underline and point this out that
a .... like you can see this.
Over and out. my last2cents on this.
/G?tz
--
G?tz Reinicke
IT-Koordinator
Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420
E-Mail goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
Filmakademie Baden-W?rttemberg GmbH
Akademiehof 10
71638 Ludwigsburg
www.filmakademie.de
Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: J?rgen Walter MdL
Staatssekret?r im Ministerium f?r Wissenschaft,
Forschung und Kunst Baden-W?rttemberg
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Prof. Thomas Schadt
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:35:04 -0600
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems
Message-ID:
<CAOAgVpzuxBCqhLR5WbV6eZwHW4U_6=S+CTO-Lqi=4eFYTjMcJg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
wrote:>
> output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
lstat()
> failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n"
Ownership or selinux problem?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:42:30 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems
Message-ID: <546CC876.90708 at htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 11/19/2014 10:35 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at
htt-consult.com> wrote:
>> output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
lstat()
>> failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n"
> Ownership or selinux problem?
Unfortunately no selinux on RSEL. has to do, in part, with it being a
port to armv5, eventhough I run it on armv7.
I looked at the permissions and from /var/spool/amavisd it is owned by
amavis:amavis
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:12:08 -0600
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems
Message-ID:
<CAOAgVpx0F+24nt-4dsZ4VuYrPB_WwffG0o5UoR9D3QaWLQgusw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at
htt-consult.com> wrote:>
> On 11/19/2014 10:35 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at
htt-consult.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts:
>>> lstat()
>>> failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n"
>>
>> Ownership or selinux problem?
>
>
> Unfortunately no selinux on RSEL. has to do, in part, with it being a port
> to armv5, eventhough I run it on armv7.
>
> I looked at the permissions and from /var/spool/amavisd it is owned by
> amavis:amavis
Without selinux, permission errors are usually pretty straightforward
- that is, if something logs a 'permission denied', it means exactly
that. I could be anywhere up the path, or the program accessing it
might not have the uid you expect, though.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:40:55 -0600
From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
Message-ID: <m4iv8p$cg6$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build
the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it
successfully builds an i386 RPM.
If I try to build an i686 RPM, I get nothing:
$ rpmbuild --target i686 foo.spec
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
And I'm returned to command prompt with no error message. The SPEC file
doesn't contain any architecture-related tags.
I feel like I must be missing something really, really basic, but I'll
be darned if I can figure out what it might be.
Any ideas?
--
=======================================================================Ian
Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com
-------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship"
--------
=======================================================================
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:49:18 -0600
From: Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
Message-ID:
<20141119144918.feb19dda869b36b271166abf at melvilletheatre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:40:55 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build
> the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it
> successfully builds an i386 RPM.
export CC="gcc -m32"
rpmbuild --target=i686 foo.spec
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:51:44 +0100
From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 not installable using KVM-over-IP System
Message-ID: <546D02E0.5060209 at conversis.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
I just tried to install CentOS 7 using a Lantronix Spider KVM-over-IP
System and its virtual media feature and to my surprise this did not work.
The installation using the netinstall iso seems to work for a while (I
see some dracut boot messages) but when the first stage of the boot is
finished I get dropped into an emergency shell with the error message
that "/dev/root does not exist".
I tried this on a Supermicro system and a gen-8 HP ProLiant Server both
with the same result.
Using CentOS 6 instead worked fine and I could install the Systems
without issues.
Any idea what the problem could be? Given that the iso is passed through
as a USB storage device I'm not sure what the problem could be.
Regards,
Dennis
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:34:49 -0600
From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
Message-ID: <m4j2dq$ras$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 11/19/2014 02:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote:> export CC="gcc -m32"
> rpmbuild --target=i686 foo.spec
Same result.
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
No error message or code.
Weird. Weird. Weird. (And I can't escape the feeling that I've seen
this before.)
--
=======================================================================Ian
Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com
-------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship"
--------
=======================================================================
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:02:33 +0000
From: Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
Message-ID: <546D1379.3010505 at unixmail.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 19/11/14 20:40, Ian Pilcher wrote:> I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build
> the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it
> successfully builds an i386 RPM.
>
> If I try to build an i686 RPM, I get nothing:
>
> $ rpmbuild --target i686 foo.spec
> Building target platforms: i686
> Building for target i686
>
> And I'm returned to command prompt with no error message. The SPEC
file
> doesn't contain any architecture-related tags.
>
> I feel like I must be missing something really, really basic, but I'll
> be darned if I can figure out what it might be.
>
> Any ideas?
>
Try running rpmbuild verbosely with -vv and see if that gives you any clues.
Can you rebuild other i686 packages? That should tell you if the issue
is with your build system or the package in question.
Have you ever edited any arch related parameters in ~/.rpmrc?
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:57:06 -0600
From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
Message-ID: <m4je93$ah$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 11/19/2014 04:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:> Try running rpmbuild verbosely with -vv and see if that gives you any
clues.
I just figure it out. I am a moron.
When I added "--target i686" to the command line (or "--target
i386"), I
was omitting the "-bb". rpmbuild wasn't doing anything, because I
didn't tell it to do anything. I.e. I was literally typing "rpmbuild
--target i686 foo.spec".
I'm going to crawl back into my hole now. Please ignore this thread.
:-/
--
=======================================================================Ian
Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com
-------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship"
--------
=======================================================================
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:55:33 -0500
From: Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
Message-ID: <546D5825.3080301 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 11/19/14 19:57, Ian Pilcher wrote:> On 11/19/2014 04:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
>> Try running rpmbuild verbosely with -vv and see if that gives you any
clues.
>
> I just figure it out. I am a moron.
>
> When I added "--target i686" to the command line (or
"--target i386"), I
> was omitting the "-bb". rpmbuild wasn't doing anything,
because I
> didn't tell it to do anything. I.e. I was literally typing
"rpmbuild
> --target i686 foo.spec".
>
> I'm going to crawl back into my hole now. Please ignore this thread.
>
> :-/
>
Hey Ian,
Could you post the successful command line to the mail list, including
the -bb, for the benefit of those who might be searching for a solution
to the same problem you tripped over.
Change the subject to Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386
works)(SOLVED)
--
_
?v?
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/
****
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:58:56 +0800
From: Tom <yanjingtao at gmail.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Please remove mirrors.skyshe.cn from mirror
list,Thanks!
Message-ID: <546D9F40.8020903 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi,
This is a (new?) mirror in China, but I found this mirror hasn't
enough bandwidth, I have tested in many server in China, this mirror has
a low ping (smaller than 30ms), and a very low download speed(smaller
than 10KB/s), so fastestmirror will let it to be the best mirror, but
download very slow.
I am really happy to see that skyshe.cn is willing to provide this
service. However, I don't think their bandwidth is enough to handle this
service.
Tom
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:44:38 +0100
From: Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] exercising pam_cracklib from the command line
Message-ID: <546DB806.3070906 at takeit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-11-17 20:57, James B. Byrne wrote:> CentOS-6.6
>
> Is there any command line program that determines and reports what
> pam_cracklib.so returns for a given password; subject to variation
> in the command line options and values provided? For example,
> assuming a cli driver program called cli_driver_pgm:
>
> cli_driver_pgm pam_cracklib.so difok=8 minlen=14 dcredit=3
> ucredit=3 lcredit=3 ocredit=3 minclass=2 maxrepeat=3 maxsequence=3
> reject_username gecoscheck -- somepassword
>
> -> pam_cracklib calculated minlen value for somepassword
>
>
> My Google-fu appears to have deserted me.
>
Googling for `"pam_cracklib" cli tool` got me a recommendation of
`cracklib-check` via superuser [1]. Not sure if that does what you want,
but it might be a start?
[1]: http://superuser.com/q/441220
- --
AF24 6DE9 D1DF DFB8 3A74 A7AC F457 B7A3 5DF1 4240
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=WIze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
End of CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20
***************************************
g
2014-Nov-20 20:11 UTC
[CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 - Email found in subject
On 11/20/2014 08:29 AM, David Docherty wrote: <> Received hello david, you really made my day. glad to see _you_received_ "CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20". i really do appreciate your posting this digest. now i have *TWO* copies of all those post. if you would really like something interesting to read, follow this link; http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp/ListInfo/Policy?highlight=%28digest%29 while reading, please note the line that has word "digest" highlighted. you might get an idea of how to make your posts even more enjoyable in the future. have a great day. p.s. please excuse my not posting all of your post. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc,hago. g .