Hi all. I am thinking about installing memcached with replication, I've found http://sourceforge.net/projects/repcached/files/repcached/2.2.1-1.2.8/ but it is for 1.2.8, and for Centos 6.3 memcached is in version 1.4.4. I do not want to use client side "replication" (writing to two memcached nodes at the same time) and haven't found other solution. Are there any good, protocol compatible solutions? What do you think about couchbase? Best regards, Rafal.
What do you think about http://mdounin.ru/ and http://silverdire.com/2012/06/01/memcached-1-4-13-replication/ ? 2012/11/9 Rafa? Radecki <radecki.rafal at gmail.com>> Hi all. > > I am thinking about installing memcached with replication, I've found > http://sourceforge.net/projects/repcached/files/repcached/2.2.1-1.2.8/ but > it is for 1.2.8, and for Centos 6.3 memcached is in version 1.4.4. I do not > want to use client side "replication" (writing to two memcached nodes at > the same time) and haven't found other solution. > Are there any good, protocol compatible solutions? What do you think about > couchbase? > > Best regards, > Rafal. > > > >
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Rafa? Radecki <radecki.rafal at gmail.com> wrote:> I am thinking about installing memcached with replication, I've found > http://sourceforge.net/projects/repcached/files/repcached/2.2.1-1.2.8/ but > it is for 1.2.8, and for Centos 6.3 memcached is in version 1.4.4. I do not > want to use client side "replication" (writing to two memcached nodes at > the same time) and haven't found other solution. > Are there any good, protocol compatible solutions? What do you think about > couchbase? >The usual way to use memcached is to have enough servers that losing one doesn't force enough cache refreshes to overload your persistent backend database, so there probably aren't many people on this list with experience with those other products. You would probably get better answers about your situation from their own respective support mail lists. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com