Rafał Radecki
2012-Jun-26 13:40 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
Hi all. I am working for a hosting provider in Poland. We are currently searching for an universal, extensible hardware platform which we would like to use in our server infrastructure. The platform should have: - possibility to install up to 32GB of RAM and at least 4 slots for it; - at least 6 SATA ports; - the possibility to use SAS disks; - at least one 1Gb/s network interface and the possibility to add another one; - size of 2 or 3U; - hot swap for disks. We are looking for a solution in which we would be able to deploy a basic server with for example 2 SATA disks, 8GB of RAM, 1 NIC, 4 cors and to be able to use the same enclosure and motherboard and extend it to deploy a more heavy-duty server with for example 6 SATA disks, 24GB of RAM, 2 NICs, 8 cors. Which manufacturer can you recommend and why? We are looking for something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support. All servers will be based on CentOS5/6 :) Best regards, Rafal Radecki.
John Doe
2012-Jun-26 14:03 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
From: Rafa? Radecki <radecki.rafal at gmail.com>> We are looking for something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support.Something reliable, good and not expensive... hum... We all do! But quite a few people recommend Supermicro. JD
John R Pierce
2012-Jun-26 14:15 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
On 06/26/12 6:40 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote:> - at least 6 SATA ports; > - the possibility to use SAS disks;if the system supports SAS disks, you don't need any SATA ports. you can plug SATA drives into SAS hotswap bays with most any SAS controllers. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast
m.roth at 5-cent.us
2012-Jun-26 14:37 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
Hi, Rafal, Rafa? Radecki wrote:> > I am working for a hosting provider in Poland. We are currently > searching for an universal, extensible hardware platform which we > would like to use in our server infrastructure. > The platform should have: > - possibility to install up to 32GB of RAM and at least 4 slots for it; > - at least 6 SATA ports; > - the possibility to use SAS disks; > - at least one 1Gb/s network interface and the possibility to add another > one; > - size of 2 or 3U; > - hot swap for disks. > We are looking for a solution in which we would be able to deploy a > basic server with for example 2 SATA disks, 8GB of RAM, 1 NIC, 4 cors > and to be able to use the same enclosure and motherboard and extend it > to deploy a more heavy-duty server with for example 6 SATA disks, 24GB > of RAM, 2 NICs, 8 cors. > Which manufacturer can you recommend and why? We are looking for > something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support. > All servers will be based on CentOS5/6 :)Are you looking for full servers, or to build from parts? Someone just recommended Supermicro; I'm not a big fan of them just now - we have a good number of servers from Penguin Computing that use that, and the 64 core systems seem to have a lot of problems. Their 48 core servers seem fine. Btw, all the above are 1U, have 3 hot swap bays, and are all SATA. Their support has been quite decent. More expensive, Dell. An R41x, R61x, or, for heavy duty work, an R81x, are really serious, the last two take eight, I think, SAS drives (the small ones - 2.5"?). Their service is outstanding. *All* of the above, both Dell and Penguin, have two NICs. All will take well beyond 64G of memory (we have a Penguin Altus 1804 and a Dell R815, I think it is, with (excuse me, my mind SEGVs every time I think of this) 250G of memory.... Under no circumstances should you buy Sun/Oracle. Service... here in the Washington, DC area, about a year and a half ago, it took me a MONTH to get one server fixed w/ on-site support. They're there to make a profit - I mean, how do you *think* Larry Ellison pays for his fighter jet, yacht, and Hawaiian island? - *NOT* to sell you hardware and service that serves your purposes. mark
Eero Volotinen
2012-Jun-26 19:08 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
2012/6/26 Rafa? Radecki <radecki.rafal at gmail.com>:> Hi all. > > I am working for a hosting provider in Poland. We are currently > searching for an universal, extensible hardware platform which we > would like to use in our server infrastructure. > The platform should have: > - possibility to install up to 32GB of RAM and at least 4 slots for it; > - at least 6 SATA ports; > - the possibility to use SAS disks; > - at least one 1Gb/s network interface and the possibility to add another one; > - size of 2 or 3U; > - hot swap for disks. > We are looking for a solution in which we would be able to deploy a > basic server with for example 2 SATA disks, 8GB of RAM, 1 NIC, 4 cors > and to be able to use the same enclosure and motherboard and extend it > to deploy a more heavy-duty server with for example 6 SATA disks, 24GB > of RAM, 2 NICs, 8 cors. > Which manufacturer can you recommend and why? We are looking for > something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support. > All servers will be based on CentOS5/6 :)Dell? Something like Dell Poweredge R710 ? -- Eero
David Hrbáč
2012-Jun-26 19:58 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
Dne 26.6.2012 15:40, Rafa? Radecki napsal(a):> Hi all. > > I am working for a hosting provider in Poland. We are currently > searching for an universal, extensible hardware platform which we > would like to use in our server infrastructure. > The platform should have: > - possibility to install up to 32GB of RAM and at least 4 slots for it; > - at least 6 SATA ports; > - the possibility to use SAS disks; > - at least one 1Gb/s network interface and the possibility to add another one; > - size of 2 or 3U; > - hot swap for disks. > We are looking for a solution in which we would be able to deploy a > basic server with for example 2 SATA disks, 8GB of RAM, 1 NIC, 4 cors > and to be able to use the same enclosure and motherboard and extend it > to deploy a more heavy-duty server with for example 6 SATA disks, 24GB > of RAM, 2 NICs, 8 cors. > Which manufacturer can you recommend and why? We are looking for > something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support. > All servers will be based on CentOS5/6 :) >Cisco UCS? :o) Kidding, too pricey for these requirements. Your requirements are quite low and almost every desktop motherboard is ok nowadays. If your infra is built with failure in mind, you can go Google way. No special HW, just HA sw solution. Regards, David Hrb??
Patrick McEvoy
2012-Jun-26 20:32 UTC
[CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
On 06/26/2012 08:40 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote:> Hi all. > > I am working for a hosting provider in Poland. We are currently > searching for an universal, extensible hardware platform which we > would like to use in our server infrastructure. > The platform should have: > - possibility to install up to 32GB of RAM and at least 4 slots for it; > - at least 6 SATA ports; > - the possibility to use SAS disks; > - at least one 1Gb/s network interface and the possibility to add another one; > - size of 2 or 3U; > - hot swap for disks. > We are looking for a solution in which we would be able to deploy a > basic server with for example 2 SATA disks, 8GB of RAM, 1 NIC, 4 cors > and to be able to use the same enclosure and motherboard and extend it > to deploy a more heavy-duty server with for example 6 SATA disks, 24GB > of RAM, 2 NICs, 8 cors. > Which manufacturer can you recommend and why? We are looking for > something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support. > All servers will be based on CentOS5/6 :) > > Best regards, > Rafal Radecki. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centosWe have a few machines where I work from Pogo Linux which work really well, http://www.pogolinux.com/ Patrick