Interesting story at Groklaw...just thought I would share:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120913073511444
--
_
?v?
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registerd Linux user No #267004
www.counter.li.org
****
Mark LaPierre wrote:> > Interesting story at Groklaw...just thought I would share: > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120913073511444Very interesting. I'm not sure I've ever heard of Twin Peaks, and Groklaw notes they have almost no installed base, if I understood that correctly. Gluster, on the other hand, has been around for years, and has a fair-sized installed base, and is moderately well-known. One thing RH seems to have in reserve is that the patent has not been enforced, and so they've lost that right. mark
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:11:41 -0400 Mark LaPierre <marklapier at aol.com> wrote:> > > Interesting story at Groklaw...just thought I would share: > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120913073511444 >I find that quite amusing :-D. TwinPeaks "Let's Sue a company that's a lot bigger than us!" Redhat "Ha, you can do that, but while you do, We are going to counter sue as you are copying GPL code, and not keeping to the license! :-) Have a nice day" Sorry, but this one truly deserves a "FAIL!" (to TwinPeaks) Haha :-). Thanks for the laughs :-). -- Jake Shipton (JakeMS) GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120917/a806a8a7/attachment-0003.sig>