CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16 which is referring back to the RHBA. Does anyone have some insight ? What is #606272 about ? Maybe I should ask Upstream Vendor ? Is it normal that information about fasttracked packages is not available publicly ? -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110430/a3f63d49/attachment-0005.sig>
The title gives a bit of info if that helps ;-) Kai
On 30/04/11 17:57, Markus Falb wrote:> CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html > > While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, > Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information > about it. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 > > The only information I see is comment 16 which is referring back > to the RHBA. > > Does anyone have some insight ? What is #606272 about ? > Maybe I should ask Upstream Vendor ? Is it normal that information about > fasttracked packages is not available publicly ? > >The Fastrack release ONLY addresses the local_scan() and man page issues to which you refer; see here: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html The other issue was addressed in a previous bug fix errata: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0522.html