CentOS - Oct 2010 - Can we use gstreamer bad, ugly and ffmpeg packages ( installed using binary rpms) without any legal problems

Hi

We are using centos 5.3 Operating system. It comes with basic gstreamer
setup including gstreamer, gstreamer-tools, gstreamer-plugins-base and
gstreamer-plugins-good packages. To support different media formats we had
to install gstreamer-plugins-bad, gstreamer-plugins-ugly and
gstreamer-plugins-ffmpeg from third party repository like rpmfusion as
centos repository is not providing these packages. My question is, Can we
use these packages ( bad, ugly and ffmpeg) without any legal or licensing
issues? If No, Please tell the legal way of using them.

thanks
G Praveen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101020/06475b5f/attachment-0002.html>

Hi,

On 10/20/2010 02:33 PM, praveenya kumar wrote:
> we use these packages ( bad, ugly and ffmpeg) without any legal or
> licensing issues? If No, Please tell the legal way of using them.
The only person who can answer that question definitively is your 
lawyer; Also, it depends on where you are, where you machine is, where 
your code is and how/ what you are doing with it. So, speak to your 
lawyer. (S)He's the person who will need to prep your legal case should 
it ever come to that.

- KB