Do CentOS 5.4 users still have to use the RedHat preliminary kernels (http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/) for getting a NFSv4 safe kernel or have the patches been incorporated into CentosPlus kernels? Or is kernel-2.6.18-164.3.1.el5 somewhere in the queue? Thanks in advance! GS -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Structural Biomechanics (E317) Tel.: +43 664 60 588 3171 Vienna University of Technology / Austria Fax: +43 1 58801 31799 A-1040 Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/~gs/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091031/60079a90/attachment-0001.sig>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Gerhard Schneider <gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:> > Do CentOS 5.4 users still have to use the RedHat preliminary kernels > (http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/) for getting a NFSv4 safe kernel or > have the patches been incorporated into CentosPlus kernels? > > Or is kernel-2.6.18-164.3.1.el5 somewhere in the queue?kernel-2.6.18-164.3.1 is not publicly available. The centosplus kernel 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5.centos.plus now has patches that were referred to in this bug tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3840 BZ#522163: nfsd4: turn nfsd4_open struct's iattr/verf union into separate fields BZ#522163: nfsd4: reindent do_open_lookup() BZ#522163: nfsd4: fix open-create permissions Akemi