Hi Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my SIL card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, though it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller with a controller that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD and not multiple HDs as it happens with the SIL controller. Recommendations anyone? -- TIA Paolo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090208/0521b1d5/attachment.html>
2009/2/8 Paolo Supino <paolo.supino at gmail.com>:> Hi > Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my SIL > card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, though it > doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller with a controller > that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD and not multiple HDs as > it happens with the SIL controller. Recommendations anyone?Hi, 3ware (9650 are nice) or areca. or even software raid. Laurent
> Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my SIL > card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, though > it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller with a > controller that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD and not > multiple HDs as it happens with the SIL controller. Recommendations anyone?3ware, areca, adaptec t
On 2/8/2009 4:38 AM, Paolo Supino wrote:> Hi > > Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my > SIL card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, > though it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller > with a controller that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD > and not multiple HDs as it happens with the SIL controller. > Recommendations anyone? > > > > -- > TIA > Paolo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >anything areca or 3ware.
> 3ware, areca, adaptec > > t > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >careful on adaptec..a fair amount of their cards are fraid as well.
Paolo Supino wrote:> Hi > > Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my SIL > card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, though > it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller with a > controller that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD and not > multiple HDs as it happens with the SIL controller. Recommendations anyone? > > > > -- > TIA > Paolo > >The software raid in linux with mdadm is very powerful. Alot of people stay away from software raid because they think that a hardware solution would be easier to work with. But with a hardware solution, how do you monitor the status of your drives? There is usually windows software for that but normally a linux client is non existent. All of the monitoring and management is built into mdadm. Once you learn it, it is very easy to use and you can move your raid array from system to system as long as mdadm is installed. You certainly can't move a hardware raid setup to another machine unless the cards are identical. Sam
Paolo Supino wrote:> Hi > > Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my SIL > card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, though > it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller with a > controller that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD and not > multiple HDs as it happens with the SIL controller. Recommendations anyone? >Adaptec RAID 2405, 3ware, Areca