I've just installed CentOS 5.2 for the x86_64 on a SuperMicro X6DA8-G board with two 250g SATA drives configured in the bios as a raid 1 array. After getting the base installed, I've tried to yum update the system and I wind up with these errors.... --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.14(libmysqlclient_14)(64bit) is needed by package perl-DBD-mysql Error: Missing Dependency: libgsf-1.so.1()(64bit) is needed by package libwpd Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.24()(64bit) is needed by package subversion Error: Missing Dependency: libaprutil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package subversion Error: Missing Dependency: libpq.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package perl-DBD-Pg Error: Missing Dependency: libapr-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package subversion Error: Missing Dependency: libevent-1.1a.so.1()(64bit) is needed by package nfs-utils Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.14()(64bit) is needed by package perl-DBD-mysql I'd like to think that out of the box centos would at least update without a bunch of missing dependencies. Any pointers as to what the best solution is? Thanks.. Sam
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Sam Drinkard wrote:> I've just installed CentOS 5.2 for the x86_64 on a SuperMicro X6DA8-G > board with two 250g SATA drives configured in the bios as a raid 1 > array. After getting the base installed, I've tried to yum update the > system and I wind up with these errors.... > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Missing Dependency: > libmysqlclient.so.14(libmysqlclient_14)(64bit) is needed by packagesnip> > I'd like to think that out of the box centos would at least update > without a bunch of missing dependencies. Any pointers as to what the > best solution is? > > Thanks.. > > Sam >What is in /etc/yum.repos.d? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE jim at rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.com "Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." Thomas Paine
Sam Drinkard wrote:> I've just installed CentOS 5.2 for the x86_64 on a SuperMicro X6DA8-G > board with two 250g SATA drives configured in the bios as a raid 1 > array. After getting the base installed, I've tried to yum update the > system and I wind up with these errors.... > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Missing Dependency: > libmysqlclient.so.14(libmysqlclient_14)(64bit) is needed by package > perl-DBD-mysqlYou seem to have the rpmforge repository installed, because the package in the base repositories is called perl-DBD-MySQL (note the mixed case MySQL). You should use the priorities plugin to clear that up. And you need to exclude perl-DBD-mysql from the rpmforge repository, as the priorities plugin seems to be case sensitive. More information on Priorities: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities More info on Repositories: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081119/178d2f77/attachment-0003.sig>
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:27:24 +0100:> You seem to have the rpmforge repository installed, because the package > in the base repositories is called perl-DBD-MySQL (note the mixed case > MySQL).and got replaced because the default install of yum-priorities doesn't check_obsoletes. base package perl-DBD-MySQL was indeed obsoleted by the rpmforge perl-DBD-mysql a few weeks ago. I fear a lot of people got caught by this without guard. I wonder why rpmforge did this. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Steve Huff wrote:> On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Vandaman wrote: > > > What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you > linked to. > > It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of > upstream changes > > as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora > rawhide at least > > even if the changes are backported int RHEL. > > > we went over this last month: > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/065972.html > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066185.html > > and also on the rpmforge users list: > > http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2008-October/001973.html > > you were on the CentOS list then, i'm surprised you > don't remember. please search the archives before > posting; what you said has nothing to do with the issue. >Seems a little impertinent what our learned friend Steve Huff has sent to me off-list in a huff :- - I was subscribed for a few days last month. - Many of us don't do "just CentOS". We have other mailing lists and OS's installed. We also happen to have lives as well to live. - Even this month when I'm subscribed fulltime to the list, I don't read all messages on the list (nuff' said). - What is posted on the list is "not Gospel". If something affects all CentOS users, perhaps a prominent announcement could be made on the website or somewhere. - I'm sure there are issues other than the Debian Openssl bug that affect all CentOS users. Regards, Vandaman.