Hi List, Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of the log entries (var/log/maillog) are processed at all. Should I file a bug report on this? Upstream? cheers Henry
henry ritzlmayr wrote:> Hi List, > > Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 > > However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of > the log entries (var/log/maillog) are processed at all. > > Should I file a bug report on this? Upstream?See <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424031> - not that that helps much at the moment. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080827/c3fafba2/attachment-0005.sig>
Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:> henry ritzlmayr wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 > > > > However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of > > the log entries (var/log/maillog) are processed at all. > > > > Should I file a bug report on this? Upstream? > > See <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424031> - not that that > helps much at the moment. > > Cheers, > > RalphHi Ralph, its not a big deal for me. I patched the scripts here on my own and it works now. I just wanted to report this, so that others don?t have to do the same, and I can revert to standard afterwards. Thanks for the bugzilla link. cheers Henry