CentOS - May 2008 - kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 centosplus?

Been a week, any eta? :)

Thanks!
-- 
Matthew Kent \ SA \ bravenet.com

Matthew Kent wrote:
> Been a week, any eta? :)
> 
> Thanks!
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to 
  get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 
5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080528/27f4799f/attachment-0005.sig>

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 13:08 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Matthew Kent wrote:
> > Been a week, any eta? :)
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to 
>   get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 
> 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
> 
Ah of course, sounds great. 

Happy to wait for 5.2.
-- 
Matthew Kent \ SA \ bravenet.com

On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can  
> try to  get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter  
> have the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Does the 5.2 kernel include the NFS patch (RH bug 321111 I think)?   
The only reason I am using the centosplus kernel is because of the  
NFS performance issue.  Oh, and I also like to have framebuffer  
support in the kernel which was missing from the previous centosplus  
kernel.  So if the 5.2 kernel includes the NFS patch, and has FB  
support, that would make my day!

Alfred :-)