CentOS - Feb 2008 - CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?

CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?

RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs?

Why not?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080201/299413fb/attachment-0001.html>

Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> 
> RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs?
> 
> Why not?
Because Linux is a perfectly good operating system already without 
layering Emacs on top of it.

On Feb 1, 2008 8:11 PM, Kenneth Wolcott <kennethwolcott at gmail.com>
wrote:
> CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?
>
> RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs?
>
> Why not?
>
RH-5 does not have Xemacs because a choice had to me made on using
Emacs or Xemacs. Trying to support both was resource intensive and I
think fewer people were installing Xemacs versus Emacs according to
RHN stats..



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"