If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less.
Hi, I am running bind on centOS5. I use RPM. Is there a patch ? Any idea to apply the patch? On 7/25/07, Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> wrote:> > If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. > > http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 > > I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070725/b3fe8d3b/attachment.html>
On 7/24/07, Indunil Jayasooriya <indunil75 at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, > > I am running bind on centOS5. I use RPM. > > Is there a patch ? > > Any idea to apply the patch? >yum update The problem was released as a bug fix earlier today. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
> Feizhou wrote: > If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. > > http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 > > I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less.Feizhou, You could care less? Huh? Come on now Feiz you old salty dog. Your love shows, you posted to the CentOS list about it... Awwwwwwwwwwww, we love you too! :-) - rh