Robert Moskowitz
2006-Jul-18 15:14 UTC
[CentOS] Thunderbird Upgraded from 1.0.8 to 1.5.0.4 and MOZ_NO_REMOTE dead
Since Centos 4.3 comes with Thunderbird 1.0.8, I downloaded the tar of 1.5.0.4 fro mozilla and tried to figure out what to do with it. per http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/releases/1.5.0.4.html#install I was just suppose to copy the files.... In the end I put it in /usr/lib/thunderbird I am NOT a Linux guy so could not figure out how to properly replace /usr/lib/thunderbird-1.0.8 and /usr/bin/thunderbird... So I setup the following script, acct1mail: set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird -profile ~/data/acct1/Mail & set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=0 and acct2mail set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird -profile ~/data/acct2/Mail & set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=0 In 1.0.8, running these two scripts (mozilla-thunderbird -profile ...)and have two copies of Thunderbird running. with 1.5.4 the second script gets: Warning: unrecognized command line flag -profile And focus returns to the running copy for acct1. Advice?
Sean O Sullivan
2006-Jul-18 15:20 UTC
[CentOS] Thunderbird Upgraded from 1.0.8 to 1.5.0.4 and MOZ_NO_REMOTE dead
Robert Moskowitz wrote:> Since Centos 4.3 comes with Thunderbird 1.0.8, I downloaded the tar of > 1.5.0.4 fro mozilla and tried to figure out what to do with it.<snip>> Warning: unrecognized command line flag -profile > > And focus returns to the running copy for acct1. > > Advice?On a package-based system, use packages, not source. http://dev.centos.org/centos/4.4beta/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.2-0.1.EL4.centos4.i386.rpm Regards, Sean
Robert Moskowitz
2006-Jul-18 17:11 UTC
[CentOS] Thunderbird Upgraded from 1.0.8 to 1.5.0.4 and MOZ_NO_REMOTE dead
Well, I had driven home to me how much more I need to get organized.... A desktop notebook needs a little more, it seems, than a nice stable server. I have to learn about using the CentOS-Plus repository and some 'beta' rpm stuff... I did the install: rpm -Uhv thunderbird-1.5.0.2-0.1.EL4.centos4.i386.rpm I downloaded the rpm as a user, but ran the rpm SUed. Three problems: Does not fix my MOZ_NO_REMOTE problem. No ICON associated in the window (running gnome). When I do an extensions check update, I get a whole bunch of language extenstions listed that cannot be checked as: Update not supported (install location is read only). Oh and this compose window and the extensions window also lack their icons. Is there a beta 4.4 list where I should point this out? Sean O Sullivan wrote:> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Since Centos 4.3 comes with Thunderbird 1.0.8, I downloaded the tar of >> 1.5.0.4 fro mozilla and tried to figure out what to do with it. > > <snip> > >> Warning: unrecognized command line flag -profile >> >> And focus returns to the running copy for acct1. >> >> Advice? > > On a package-based system, use packages, not source. > > http://dev.centos.org/centos/4.4beta/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.2-0.1.EL4.centos4.i386.rpm > > > > Regards, > > Sean > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >
Robert Moskowitz
2006-Jul-18 23:00 UTC
[CentOS] Thunderbird Upgraded from 1.0.8 to 1.5.0.4 and MOZ_NO_REMOTE dead
Sean O Sullivan wrote:> Sean O Sullivan wrote: >>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> Since Centos 4.3 comes with Thunderbird 1.0.8, I downloaded the >>>> tar of >>>> 1.5.0.4 fro mozilla and tried to figure out what to do with it. >>>> <snip> >>>> So I setup the following script, acct1mail: >>>> >>>> set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 >>>> /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird -profile ~/data/acct1/Mail & >>>> set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=0 >>>> >>>> and acct2mail >>>> >>>> set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 >>>> /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird -profile ~/data/acct2/Mail & >>>> set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=0 >>>> >>> On a package-based system, use packages, not source. >>> >>> http://dev.centos.org/centos/4.4beta/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.2-0.1.EL4.centos4.i386.rpm >>> >>> > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I did the install: rpm -Uhv >> thunderbird-1.5.0.2-0.1.EL4.centos4.i386.rpm >> >> I downloaded the rpm as a user, but ran the rpm SUed. Three problems: >> >> Does not fix my MOZ_NO_REMOTE problem. > You might try : > MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 > export MOZ_NO_REMOTEYES! that seems to work.> also, after quick google, are you meant to specify profile location, > or profile name? > Instead of > -profile ~/data/acct1/Mail > > try, > -P "Profile Name"I believe either works. I have always used the former. And it worked fine in XP with TB 1.5.> No ICON associated in the window (running gnome). > OK, you may have to logout & log back in again for GNOME to pickup on > icons -- there may be a command to get GNOME to detect new > icons/reread pixmaps dire - unsure.No dice. I had even did a shutdown, so I could boot up my XP drive to grab a couple of files from that. No pretty ICONs. And I noticed that the Gnome Applications -> Internet -> Thunderbird does not have an icon. It pointed to mozilla-thunderbird that is gone in 1.5>> When I do an extensions check update, I get a whole bunch of language >> extenstions listed that cannot be checked as: >> >> Update not supported (install location is read only). > This is normal - to update language extensions (which is not stored in > local user profile), you must run as root/su'd.I hope I can ignore the language extensions...>> >> Oh and this compose window and the extensions window also lack their >> icons. > As above - try logging in & out.See above.>> >> Is there a beta 4.4 list where I should point this out? > centos-devel list I assume, > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > Also, try not top-posting, makes it harder/more effort to reply.Still getting TB to work the way Eudora did. None of the quoting options are as good as Eudora's was, and I am still stumbling along...
Seemingly Similar Threads
- NT4 migration errors
- Cannot rename directory - Samba acting two different ways on identical systems
- Can one invoke multiple INSTANCEs of Firefox on CentOS
- name resolution: dns name different to windows machinename
- classic upgrade sort of succeeds but really fails - Advice?