Via google: libtiff 3.8.2 http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora other' and a link http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3 for other distributions. So which do I take? ? http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html please, I really want to get this going!
Robert Moskowitz wrote:> Via google: libtiff 3.8.2 > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html > > > This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora other' and a > link > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3 > > for other distributions. > > So which do I take? > > ? > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html > > > please, I really want to get this going! >Hi - I do not believe that libtiff 3.8.2 is available for CentOS - only 3.6.1-8 and 3.6.1-10. Remember, the goal of the CentOS project is not to provide bleeding edge software, so you may well get stuck with a slightly older version. Thanks -dant
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:48 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:> Via google: libtiff 3.8.2 > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html > > This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora other' and a link > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3 > > for other distributions. > > So which do I take? > > ? > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html > > please, I really want to get this going! > >robert ... I think you are having asterisk issues, right. There will probably be other things required ... you will probably need to build it from the SRPM instead of using a regenerated RPM. FC is not going to have the proper shared libraries -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060526/b54c8ccf/attachment-0002.sig>
At 02:35 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote:>Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>Via google: libtiff 3.8.2 >>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html >> >>This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora other' and a link >>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3 >>for other distributions. >>So which do I take? >>? >>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html >> >>please, I really want to get this going! > >Hi - > >I do not believe that libtiff 3.8.2 is available for CentOS - only >3.6.1-8 and 3.6.1-10. > >Remember, the goal of the CentOS project is not to provide bleeding >edge software, so you may well get stuck with a slightly older version.So the Asterisk AT Home gang that have built on Centos may have a real problem with spandsp.
At 02:48 PM 5/26/2006, Johnny Hughes wrote:>On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:48 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Via google: libtiff 3.8.2 > > > > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html > > > > This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora > other' and a link > > > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3 > > > > for other distributions. > > > > So which do I take? > > > > ? > > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html > > > > please, I really want to get this going! > > > > >robert ... I think you are having asterisk issues, right.oh yeah.>There will probably be other things required ... you will probably need >to build it from the SRPM instead of using a regenerated RPM. FC is not >going to have the proper shared librariesFigures. I do not have a good track record of building from the SRPMs. I think I have hosed things up more than solved things. Hey, I'm a crypto protocols guy (RFC 4423 finally published!). Not an OS guy. But I can't do my protocol work outside of my head and on paper without a working OS.....
At 03:27 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote:>Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>At 02:35 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote: >> >>>Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>>>Via google: libtiff 3.8.2 >>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html >>>> >>>>This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora >>>>other' and a link >>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3 >>>>for other distributions. >>>>So which do I take? >>>>? >>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html >>>> >>>>please, I really want to get this going! >>> >>> >>>Hi - >>> >>>I do not believe that libtiff 3.8.2 is available for CentOS - only >>>3.6.1-8 and 3.6.1-10. >>> >>>Remember, the goal of the CentOS project is not to provide >>>bleeding edge software, so you may well get stuck with a slightly >>>older version. >> >>So the Asterisk AT Home gang that have built on Centos may have a >>real problem with spandsp. > >Hi, RObert - > >Well, no - not necessarily. Remember, we try to keep as close to >RHEL as we can. In fact, I don't know of anything that's actually >modified to be special for CentOS, aside from the usual. > >The *@home guys probably built their own RPMs or installs for their >setup. Even though it's based on CentOS, doesn't mean it has to BE >CentOS - it could be a heavily modified version, including >additional libraries which are mroe bleeding edge, e.g. libtiff-3.8.2. > >Hope that clears some thigns up for you.I know the Centos philosophy. I have a number of Centos servers here and building more. My mail server is Scalix running on Centos. The AAH people (actually one person according to the sourceforge page) has done a great you adding the best Asterisk products on top of Centos. The libtiff-3.6.1-10 is from Centos 4.3. Sometime back Centos had libtiff 3.6.0 which the spandsp author said works well and that 3.6.1 is broken. So those of us doing a new install are finding out that faxing is not working. So I (and many others) have to replace libtiff with either the older working version or 3.8.2. And when AAH 2.9 comes out with finally an update mechanism (instead of a reinstall), hopefully the right libtiff will be in the AAH iso.
Oh, for spandsp see:
http://asterfax.sourceforge.net/SpanDSP.html
and
http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-known-issues.html
* The FAX image handling in libtiff 3.6.1 is broken, so this
version of libtiff will not function correctly with spandsp (or
HylaFAX, or any other FAX software, I guess).
* It seems possible for the libtiff library to fall over when
handling some bad TIFF files. If spandsp is being used with Asterisk,
this might bring the entire PBX down. So far only one person has
reported this. Recent security update patches for libtiff 3.5.7,
3.6.0, and 3.6.1 hopefully correct this problem.
At 03:27 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote:>Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>At 02:35 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote:
>>
>>>Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>>Via google: libtiff 3.8.2
>>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html
>>>>
>>>>This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora
>>>>other' and a link
>>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3
>>>>for other distributions.
>>>>So which do I take?
>>>>?
>>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html
>>>>
>>>>please, I really want to get this going!
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi -
>>>
>>>I do not believe that libtiff 3.8.2 is available for CentOS - only
>>>3.6.1-8 and 3.6.1-10.
>>>
>>>Remember, the goal of the CentOS project is not to provide
>>>bleeding edge software, so you may well get stuck with a slightly
>>>older version.
>>
>>So the Asterisk AT Home gang that have built on Centos may have a
>>real problem with spandsp.
>
>Hi, RObert -
>
>Well, no - not necessarily. Remember, we try to keep as close to
>RHEL as we can. In fact, I don't know of anything that's actually
>modified to be special for CentOS, aside from the usual.
>
>The *@home guys probably built their own RPMs or installs for their
>setup. Even though it's based on CentOS, doesn't mean it has to BE
>CentOS - it could be a heavily modified version, including
>additional libraries which are mroe bleeding edge, e.g. libtiff-3.8.2.
>
>Hope that clears some thigns up for you.
>
>Thanks
>-dant
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS at centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060526/447c57f3/attachment-0002.html>
At 03:50 PM 5/26/2006, Johnny Hughes wrote:>On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:44 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Oh, for spandsp see: > > > > http://asterfax.sourceforge.net/SpanDSP.html > > > > and > > > > http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-known-issues.html > > > > * The FAX image handling in libtiff 3.6.1 is broken, so this > > version of libtiff will not function correctly with spandsp > > (or HylaFAX, or any other FAX software, I guess). > > * It seems possible for the libtiff library to fall over when > > handling some bad TIFF files. If spandsp is being used with > > Asterisk, this might bring the entire PBX down. So far only > > one person has reported this. Recent security update patches > > for libtiff 3.5.7, 3.6.0, and 3.6.1 hopefully correct this > > problem. > > > > > >We just did a security patch that might have taken care of issue 1 ... >are those 2 separate issues?yes I see a kernel patch. That means rebuilding the zaptel libraries. The only library I have built. That is because it is all cookbook. But I have a system that does not use zaptel. So I will start the update now and report back.>_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Well I did the kernel update. same libtiff ver: 3.6.1-10 Then rebuilt zaptel per general Asterisk instructions and I think things are rather broken. So off for now. At 04:10 PM 5/26/2006, Robert Moskowitz wrote:>At 03:50 PM 5/26/2006, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:44 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> > Oh, for spandsp see: >> > >> > http://asterfax.sourceforge.net/SpanDSP.html >> > >> > and >> > >> > http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-known-issues.html >> > >> > * The FAX image handling in libtiff 3.6.1 is broken, so this >> > version of libtiff will not function correctly with spandsp >> > (or HylaFAX, or any other FAX software, I guess). >> > * It seems possible for the libtiff library to fall over when >> > handling some bad TIFF files. If spandsp is being used with >> > Asterisk, this might bring the entire PBX down. So far only >> > one person has reported this. Recent security update patches >> > for libtiff 3.5.7, 3.6.0, and 3.6.1 hopefully correct this >> > problem. >> > >> > >> >>We just did a security patch that might have taken care of issue 1 ... >>are those 2 separate issues? > >yes I see a kernel patch. That means rebuilding the zaptel >libraries. The only library I have built. That is because it is all cookbook. > >But I have a system that does not use zaptel. So I will start the >update now and report back. > > > > > >>_______________________________________________ >>CentOS mailing list >>CentOS at centos.org >>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos