CentOS - Nov 2005 - php versions

Got a question with centos/rhel php versions. because in centos 3 they're
still using 4.3.2 and centos 4 which uses 4.3.9. how about the bugfixes done
in 4.4 and 4.4.1? centos/rhel updates regularly like centos 3 which already
updated for 6 times but still uses 4.3.2? is that mean we still suffer the
bugs of the original 4.3.2?


--
Regards,
Mark Quitoriano, CCNA
http://www.atamanetworks.com

Fan the flame...
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=user/register&r=19441
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051111/4adf9c02/attachment.html>

Am Fr, den 11.11.2005 schrieb Mark Quitoriano um 13:30:
> Got a question with centos/rhel php versions. because in centos 3
> they're still using 4.3.2 and centos 4 which uses 4.3.9. how about the
> bugfixes done in 4.4 and 4.4.1? centos/rhel updates regularly like
> centos 3 which already updated for 6 times but still uses 4.3.2? is
> that mean we still suffer the bugs of the original 4.3.2?
> Mark Quitoriano, CCNA

That topic has been asked many time on this list, and was answered too.
Please read

http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html

about the work done by the PNAELV.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 14:07:47 up 13 days, 12:08, load average: 0.26, 0.25, 0.18 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051111/97d51a49/attachment.sig>