.... I am new to this list (got referred here from the fedora list, COLD ....) and have a few questions. I poked around CentOS.org & couldn't figure these out, so here goes: 1. What is the correspondence, if any, betwixt RHEL, err, I mean LNAELV version #'s and CentOS version #'s ? 2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution, or periodically re-sync ? 3. How long have you been around, I have been looking for something like this for years now :-) ? -- William A. Mahaffey III --------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember, ignorance is bliss, but willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!!
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:38 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:> 1. What is the correspondence, if any, betwixt RHEL, err, I mean LNAELV > version #'s and CentOS version #'s ?RHEL X = CentOS X.0 RHEL X Update Y = CentOS X.Y> 2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution, > or periodically re-sync ?There are some minor differences, but CentOS tracks RHEL very closely. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050703/888be548/attachment-0002.sig>
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:38 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:> .... I am new to this list (got referred here from the fedora list, COLD > ....) and have a few questions. I poked around CentOS.org & couldn't > figure these out, so here goes: > > 1. What is the correspondence, if any, betwixt RHEL, err, I mean LNAELV > version #'s and CentOS version #'s ?as explained by Ignacio But one thing I again want to stress ... CentOS-3.x is CentOS-3 the updates are rolled in, just like upstream. If you have CentOS-3 and you do updates, you will get to CentOS-3.5 (This is exactly like upstream ... if you have EL3 and do updates, you have EL 3 update 5). Also just like upstream, it makes no difference if you start with CentOS-3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 or any other CentOS-3 ... when you are done with updates, you will be at the latest CentOS-3 level (currently 3.5).> 2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution, > or periodically re-sync ? >We use the unmodified SRPMS provided from upstream as is as much as possible, and there are only a very small percentage of SRPMS that are changed in any way (94% SRPMS are exactly as upstream). For CentOS-4, see these release notes that explain the differences: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES-en.html The major majority of the changes are trademark and artwork related ... anything that is not is specifically called out in the above link. We do provide some items that are not part of the upstream release and are in 3 repositories (that you should probably not use if you want maximum likeness). They are the extras, contrib and centosplus repos. See this readme for all the centos repos that are available: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/Readme.txt Here is the centosplus repo info: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/Readme.txt> 3. How long have you been around, I have been looking for something like > this for years now :-) ? >CentOS began before RHEL-3 was released in October of 2003. The first non-beta release came in January 2004. So there have been official CentOS releases for 18 months. We will be around forever :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050703/38ae054e/attachment-0002.sig>
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:38 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:> .... I am new to this list (got referred here from the fedora list, COLD > ....) and have a few questions. I poked around CentOS.org & couldn't > figure these out, so here goes:<snip>> 2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution, > or periodically re-sync ?Oh ... so we are totally synced (pretty much the maximum allowed by trademark law) ... and we remain that way (at least in the base and updates repos) all the time. If you compare the centos-announce list: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ with the RHEL-4 errata list: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html You will see that security updates are done, usually within 24 hours, of any security release upstream. When the Quarterly updates are done (now 2-4 times a year), we release the Security updates (RHSAs) immediately ... the Re-spinning of the ISOs usually takes 1-2 weeks to totally test out and release. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050703/87c78552/attachment-0002.sig>