George Dunlap
2015-Mar-09 18:01 UTC
[CentOS-virt] Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote:> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:07:54AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> Sorry about the accidental bulky quoting! Boston public transit is still slow from storms, and I'm using my phone right now. >>> >>> Also, has Xen console access gotten any better for fully virtualized guests? I've just been forcibly reminded how awkward it was to access the Linux installation screens to manipulate kickstart setups. >>> >> >> I haven't had problems accessing the graphical console of PV or HVM guests. I'm usually using virt-viewer to use the VNC console. >> >> -- Pasi > > I was referring to the TTY text console, the one that allows > manipulation of boot options. It looks like it's still pretty awkward.What's awkward about it? When I've passed "serial=pty" in the HVM config file and run "xl console", everything seems to work pretty well for me. -George
Nico Kadel-Garcia
2015-Mar-10 03:33 UTC
[CentOS-virt] Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:01 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote:> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:07:54AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>>> Sorry about the accidental bulky quoting! Boston public transit is still slow from storms, and I'm using my phone right now. >>>> >>>> Also, has Xen console access gotten any better for fully virtualized guests? I've just been forcibly reminded how awkward it was to access the Linux installation screens to manipulate kickstart setups. >>>> >>> >>> I haven't had problems accessing the graphical console of PV or HVM guests. I'm usually using virt-viewer to use the VNC console. >>> >>> -- Pasi >> >> I was referring to the TTY text console, the one that allows >> manipulation of boot options. It looks like it's still pretty awkward. > > What's awkward about it? When I've passed "serial=pty" in the HVM > config file and run "xl console", everything seems to work pretty well > for me. >And playing with the grub settings. And making sure that the installer correctly handles serial access, which tends to confuse the heck out of anaconda, and has only gotten worse with the pointlessly and insistently graphical installers in CentOS 7. I'm not blaming the CentOS team, this came from Fedora upstream to RHEL.
George Dunlap
2015-Mar-11 14:30 UTC
[CentOS-virt] Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote:> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:01 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:07:54AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>>>> Sorry about the accidental bulky quoting! Boston public transit is still slow from storms, and I'm using my phone right now. >>>>> >>>>> Also, has Xen console access gotten any better for fully virtualized guests? I've just been forcibly reminded how awkward it was to access the Linux installation screens to manipulate kickstart setups. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I haven't had problems accessing the graphical console of PV or HVM guests. I'm usually using virt-viewer to use the VNC console. >>>> >>>> -- Pasi >>> >>> I was referring to the TTY text console, the one that allows >>> manipulation of boot options. It looks like it's still pretty awkward. >> >> What's awkward about it? When I've passed "serial=pty" in the HVM >> config file and run "xl console", everything seems to work pretty well >> for me. >> > > And playing with the grub settings. And making sure that the installer > correctly handles serial access, which tends to confuse the heck out > of anaconda, and has only gotten worse with the pointlessly and > insistently graphical installers in CentOS 7. > > I'm not blaming the CentOS team, this came from Fedora upstream to RHEL.Ah, right -- my primary hat is as Xen developer, so I thought you were complaining about something on the xen side, not on the installer side. :-) -George
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
- Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
- Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
- Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
- Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5