Trevor Hemsley
2018-Jun-23 20:17 UTC
[CentOS-docs] reference page for Apache test page & the project
On 23/06/18 21:03, John R. Dennison wrote:> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:58:21PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> * Is there a better page I can point at? > 'Better' is quite subjective; however this all goes back to > > https://web.archive.org/web/20060523223519/https://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=127 > > and is as good of a reference as any. > > I would urge someone to scrape the gist of that thread and preserve it > on wiki.c.o somewhere. > > If no one else does I will do it later today or tomorrow when I have a > bit of time and motivation.You know, perhaps this is approaching this from the wrong direction. Maybe the correct solution would be to change that welcome page to be more explicit about what it is and why it's there so the question doesn't arise in the first place. It *is* better than it used to be but it could be better. If we just move the "The CentOS Project has nothing to do with this website or its content, it just provides the software that makes the website run." up to immediately after the "This server powered by CentOS" under the Testing 123... heading. Does the attached patch make it more clear more easily? It gets the essential message into the top paragrpah which is the one that gets read. Having it off the bottom of the page where it resides in the current version means you're reliant on people advancing to the next page. Trevor -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: httpd-index-html.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1143 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20180623/ca70c217/attachment-0002.bin>
Brian Mathis
2018-Jun-23 21:33 UTC
[CentOS-docs] reference page for Apache test page & the project
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Trevor Hemsley <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com> wrote:> On 23/06/18 21:03, John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:58:21PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > >> * Is there a better page I can point at? > > 'Better' is quite subjective; however this all goes back to > > > > https://web.archive.org/web/20060523223519/https://www. > centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=127 > > > > and is as good of a reference as any. > > > > I would urge someone to scrape the gist of that thread and preserve it > > on wiki.c.o somewhere. > > > > If no one else does I will do it later today or tomorrow when I have a > > bit of time and motivation. > > You know, perhaps this is approaching this from the wrong direction. > Maybe the correct solution would be to change that welcome page to be > more explicit about what it is and why it's there so the question > doesn't arise in the first place. It *is* better than it used to be but > it could be better. If we just move the "The CentOS Project has nothing > to do with this website or its content, it just provides the software > that makes the website run." up to immediately after the "This server > powered by CentOS" under the Testing 123... heading. > > Does the attached patch make it more clear more easily? It gets the > essential message into the top paragrpah which is the one that gets > read. Having it off the bottom of the page where it resides in the > current version means you're reliant on people advancing to the next page. > > Trevor >How long does one need to be in IT to realize that people simply will not read things, period? Adding more text to an already long-winded page that clearly no one is reading will not solve the problem. The only solution is to eschew vanity completely and make a page that has nothing but "Testing 123" or something equally terse, and possibly mentioning Apache, if that is a requirement somewhere. The only mention of CentOS, should be the "powered by" badge and that's it. I would remove the "powered by CentOS" in the blue header, and then ALL of the text "About CentOS" and below. I understand the intention of trying to help users and admins, but it clearly isn't. As we have seen in the past, this page causes well-known problems, and afaik provides almost no benefit so should be removed. ~ Brian Mathis @orev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20180623/6ae4e850/attachment-0002.html>
Akemi Yagi
2018-Jun-23 21:50 UTC
[CentOS-docs] reference page for Apache test page & the project
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote:> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Trevor Hemsley>> If we just move the "The CentOS Project has nothing >> to do with this website or its content, it just provides the software >> that makes the website run." up to immediately after the "This server >> powered by CentOS" under the Testing 123... heading.>> Trevor> How long does one need to be in IT to realize that people simply will not > read things, period? Adding more text to an already long-winded page that > clearly no one is reading will not solve the problem. > > The only solution is to eschew vanity completely and make a page that has > nothing but "Testing 123" or something equally terse, and possibly > mentioning Apache, if that is a requirement somewhere. The only mention of > CentOS, should be the "powered by" badge and that's it. I would remove the > "powered by CentOS" in the blue header, and then ALL of the text "About > CentOS" and below. I understand the intention of trying to help users and > admins, but it clearly isn't. > > As we have seen in the past, this page causes well-known problems, and afaik > provides almost no benefit so should be removed. > > ~ Brian MathisI was about to post my view and found that it has just been said by Brian. See the welcome page by RHEL: http://toracat.org/attic/centos/apache-welcome-RHEL.png It has a minimal amount of info about RHEL. After all, the whole purpose of the test page is to let the admin know that he/she successfully set up httpd. The page is not intended for the general public. And for someone who does not know what CentOS is, there is no point mentioning it. The CentOS badge as suggested by Brian and perhaps the "CentOS has nothing to do with ..." description quoted by Trevor will be all that is necessary. Akemi