asterisk users - Feb 2010 - OT- Using TR-069

Hi,

Phone vendors (Snom, Thomson-Technicolor, ...) are on the way to support
TR-069 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069).

Has someone experienced with TR-069 ?
What do you think of this protocol set ?

Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100216/2cbda4a8/attachment.htm

Hi,
sorry if the question seems silly, but for some reason, all these phones,
modems, ATAs use TR-069 instead of SNMP ?
I have experienced it, but as user, for a small time.

Regards


On 16 February 2010 09:54, Olivier <oza_4h07 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phone vendors (Snom, Thomson-Technicolor, ...) are on the way to support
> TR-069 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069).
>
> Has someone experienced with TR-069 ?
> What do you think of this protocol set ?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


-- 
We never did too much talking anyway
So don't think twice, it's all right
----------------------------------------------------------
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100216/bef305b2/attachment.htm

16 feb 2010 kl. 08.54 skrev Olivier:
> Hi,
> 
> Phone vendors (Snom, Thomson-Technicolor, ...) are on the way to support
TR-069 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069).
> 
> Has someone experienced with TR-069 ?
> What do you think of this protocol set ?
> 
And the SIP forum is about to release their UA Config framework. So there are a
few to choose from.

/O ;-)