...
Thanks, anyway for telling as at least, it reflects your needs.
>
>
> You want NT PtMP and i second that,
>
not being limited on the asterisk> side is a must in the
> telephony ecosystem, since the legacy PABX aren't alwsys easy to
> reconfigure.
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
--001636c5a501bedb5e0461636637
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/1/26 Benoit
<span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:maverick at
maverick.eu.org">maverick at
maverick.eu.org</a>></span><br><blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Olivier a =E9crit :<br>
<div class=3D"Ih2E3d">> Anyway, according your own
experience, how frequent is this PTP case ?<br>
</div>I can't say, i don't have any other experience than
our own lines<br>
<div class=3D"Ih2E3d">> That's the point : as
much as possible, we're trying to avoid any<br>
> re-configuration of legacy equipment.<br>
><br>
> So, how would you order TE/NT, PtP/PtMP combination starting from
the<br>
> most useful (for yourself) to the least one.<br>
> For instance, myself, I would classify them like this :<br>
> 1. TE PtMP (the most needed)<br>
> 2. NT PtMP<br>
> 3. TE PtP<br>
> 4. NT PtP (the least needed)<br>
<br>
</div>As for me it is<br>
1. TE PtP<br>
2. NT PtP<br>
3. TE PtMP<br>
4. NT PtMP<br>
<br>
At least until i encounter the need of a NT/TE PtMP setup.<br>
<br>
But i don't understand your point, NT/TE PtP and TE PtMP seem to
be<br>
already implemented,<br>
i fail to see the use of classify them, since the only missing is NT
PtMP</blockquote><div><br>The goal is to provide Matt and
Digium with valuable input as thinking "a feature is needed"
is one thing, having several people asking for it is another story ...<br>
<br>From Matt's point of view NT PtMP was the least needed ... and
so is yours ...<br><br>Thanks, anyway for telling as at least, it
reflects your needs.<br></div><blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
You want NT PtMP and i second that,<br></blockquote><blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> not being
limited on the asterisk<br>
side is a must in the<br>
telephony ecosystem, since the legacy PABX aren't alwsys easy
to<br>
reconfigure.<br>
<div><div></div><div
class=3D"Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a
href=3D"http://www.api-digital.com"
target=3D"_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a
href=3D"http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users"
target=3D"_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
--001636c5a501bedb5e0461636637--